IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C336] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 September 2022 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3DC1524AA; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTkgY3IdnIz8; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D78C14CE2C; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id u132so3683548pfc.6; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=FJqiFOz4PA+MBanno1HYHvL3C8XeQcrPeswp74h1GEI=; b=bxJUCZHkXWoDAZdGlk9DloQG9ISaAS1qMnalzH0V2Hx/km6FrEs4vwwx8MtvlOqfLR YQcrWaVJwHEMEZ/docKkCXkbk044LOnKKYMPEgO85VpSaH+N5Pk1G9ZMMVijGztD/4c8 Bk8r3OShLs/L9ej0cdnfnlm6w22PVsYrGy9Nt729xFHdX0r4Inlz1cYEAMbzMzDy8c82 Xqs7LmqSe+lAd2OE/C/z74IaCgt/82UzPQlTUySp4ZI44oa6xYcY0mJ2oOzQ4jQDWWFl FweK+J7KNRjCugEXDierPNLE2ymo++VHXoYAC1O55paPijWCvh1QY0d590u3VUhABypo b/SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=FJqiFOz4PA+MBanno1HYHvL3C8XeQcrPeswp74h1GEI=; b=K7NCUPzUZKFHlLmMsFF6KKkaPtrsnxssDTcOkg9kcrdfgYtQ71Jz2oejpd6A2uhNL1 8ySlCdTxXSlH0szUawNr/L059kjoR0KVlVnr6OmNE6UlnO7F1VG68GwwCbZMwdESZH44 D1YLaoqCKJpfiCrHL8gGrpRe7cvwwDnBeG8A4u8EyRZuVv3htLDE51leoqT9HI/P9YhZ YhcvemjDpqzZAjnqQU/zTAdVcmP+pl4mYSN5Qug8oJWWsIgBFShotTkoSBrqYrTuqy3h HyfG8XGHcwzqUWDjfFSvUr+wpVATIbhEBit3QJw83sjEaEsttTqbw1LGgQhjrz2lZKl8 26Gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1THBk7ATEZF/+qzlc/bMgoFgxvmyjV6HUt5IppbPfVvA1gFyZN ++0iK34dvFA81O8QdE+tQS0cejUi+8Yz/V3OPPM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM704VictXARVNVlRWaTpyXGhcj7nqVGQ5R0NM2Wos3cg6/QZchU7qoR+dE7T+dILPX9AazUnFO621drOlLQUvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5658:0:b0:42a:1663:b965 with SMTP id g24-20020a635658000000b0042a1663b965mr21390487pgm.486.1663702263273; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:02 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7027A37-72B6-47FA-8241-C7AD0B82C345@amsl.com>
References: <20220907050157.B644B4C29E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAHS_mjH+ni0oqNjqMVn6Vp+Kri2WxjiQz0FyFJgvXJeUZ0-veA@mail.gmail.com> <706BA4B5-7F03-415C-B38C-A2A7F13430DC@gigix.net> <CAMMESsykBb0YWH-EhysA7zPArm2SNyFi-edM-dawsryqTQigjA@mail.gmail.com> <A83D69F4-F083-4977-A107-7DBED995EB43@gigix.net> <E7027A37-72B6-47FA-8241-C7AD0B82C345@amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:31:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxw5U2wu4Og6GtCwDxK=rH3vzHS18KkTUbkm0VxeSnCYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Cc: Albert CABELLOS <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006a1f8a05e920de10"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/m8PEdE47UXZ6l3mU3HHhRQ0PFfE>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C336] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:31:08 -0000

Albert/Damien:

Hi!

We need you both to please reply with your final approval.  See below.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On September 15, 2022 at 4:22:48 PM, Alanna Paloma (apaloma@amsl.com) wrote:

Authors and Alvaro,

We have updated the text per Alvaro’s request and noted his approval on the
AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9299

Please note that, since approvals came in before the queries were answered
and additional changes were made, we would like to obtain approvals from
both authors again. Once we have received these approvals, we will move
forward with the publication process.

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.xml

The relevant diff files are posted here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48
changes)

Best regards,
RFC Editor/ap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email