IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C336] [AD] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 14 September 2022 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36310C14CE39; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4deiN93RX0p9; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4246C14CE29; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id c198so15204952pfc.13; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=ODyuhIH/BoZ+wLToiDsupYhN8fzUuaRRCTEfnVizFaI=; b=Pl3omqr7FxxcjAWNYiC5T8gD9eDDaUGLwuoEnxQSU+Eoex87dXoN/m+jvadg+jQ/1E fxKeJXJN3aFl5ADkYm71/JV9689Fr4No1d36Pbzz+WjDTPm96qGRkni6K7b04WeTT9DJ B3LaoT5vtj9ZFAkxTQ1qafJ3doVPoNmJssWeewqs2LYugABHGlQdDVeUgUuTqUb4QT8V pntpJp5w7q0yJYYFANrF6qb5G3OVs+j18rgO3DrloT/KJH8A24gshiM8RevCmajukPKu Wz/SDVqQ5YUbyioKC2FZfxKHD2fVJ82Qm7Phm8kjH5JKIA+ZuOG1AC/vF+MekKuXaes6 3Acg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date; bh=ODyuhIH/BoZ+wLToiDsupYhN8fzUuaRRCTEfnVizFaI=; b=1Idlk4Z+Cr8jHOYNim6NsaSG3I7QRDbTz0aE/6gEiXntc/g6nxYJbKjBd0s3aMzO7n H0rNJlrs0FNH1a7OSj1KIwO1VA1i19zLHO4TsjF6DtCc5x6sxJEsyK9qDapMpAAENdhD NFL9REr4HmEFydeOcFyQFu5LnjOGISlwWnbFidw26HZuEB8cp3LERr1RWUl/T7DYoY0C GScJKNKTRVTOaUJ+NtPQFrMgkFbOVB9AlXozW3WOt/TeISmmBm6qM2lCBG4h9LMqCyab iIki7QUlgXkNW6Sx36/Z6qgoSPfJicrmy3y+ZRll2LWWrRHSK0CCL6glaRnoPaOiCj7I lTqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3FZ/vqcDPbRhYLjHrpVyeH94t/V0HPOoyLU+IMkMMLbiih+IYX E1U2vTg0UrrrwA71Qv5+PNCTi7jvaLkodOJnwvA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4hXROVKVaB9DaMUiiDPHEE6KaZCf5OijletqZyTx8DkIOa4ysPIG5k+WN9zRJw4YsG361bVHDdtI9iVln2QXQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4c91:b0:543:646e:9 with SMTP id eb17-20020a056a004c9100b00543646e0009mr16149883pfb.40.1663168101194; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:20 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <706BA4B5-7F03-415C-B38C-A2A7F13430DC@gigix.net>
References: <20220907050157.B644B4C29E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAHS_mjH+ni0oqNjqMVn6Vp+Kri2WxjiQz0FyFJgvXJeUZ0-veA@mail.gmail.com> <706BA4B5-7F03-415C-B38C-A2A7F13430DC@gigix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:08:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsykBb0YWH-EhysA7zPArm2SNyFi-edM-dawsryqTQigjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>
Cc: Albert CABELLOS <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>, lisp-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/PpLbVWZ97y8h4ASQQish4le-i9A>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C336] [AD] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:08:22 -0000

On September 14, 2022 at 9:18:23 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:


> This may lead confusion with the publication date.
> What is we add: “… time of this writing (Editor’s Note: 2015)…”
>
> What do you think?

I think that would lead to more confusion as the published RFC is
intended to be current.

Has anything changed since 2015?  If not, "at the time of this
writing" is still accurate (and no change is required).  If things
have changed, we need to update the text.

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email