Re: [auth48] Correction: Re: [C381] [AD] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Sandy:

Hi!

I looked at the diffs:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-rfcdiff.html.  It looks (from
the date) like the rfc9299.original file is based on version -13 of the
draft, but -15 is the latest in the datatracker.

Ahh, now that I look at your question I realize that you’re asking about
the changes between -13 and -15.   Yes, all those changes are fine.  Thanks
for checking. :-)

Alvaro.


On September 7, 2022 at 1:07:59 AM, Sandy Ginoza ([e-mail]) wrote:

Correction to the cluster number in the subject line - this is part of
C381.
Apologies for any confusion!

> On Sep 6, 2022, at 10:01 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>
> Authors,
>
> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as
necessary)
> the following questions, which are also in the XML file.
>
> 1) <!-- [rfced] *AD, please approve the following changes:
>
> - updated and new text in Section 3.2
>
> - updates to the first paragraph of Section 3.3.1
>
> - removal of "using the native Internet core" in Section 3.4.3.1
>
> - update from "Internet global routing system" to "routing system
> beyond the local LISP domain" in Section 3.5
>
> - removal of "Typical values of TTL defined by LISP are 24 hours" in
> Section 4.1
>
> - new text and change from "IBGP" to "IGP" in Section 4.2
>
> - new paragraph at the end of Section 6
>
> - updates to the "To improve resiliency ..." paragraph in Section 8 -->
>
>