IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C336] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

dsaucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Tue, 20 September 2022 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E79C14CE36; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=inria.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nce9V0Uy1cxy; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E7AC14CF13; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rnFxUSYZTwDHy+iNaixXnLPMXxMDs+ZbBeBF61hATqY=; b=T2H54WY7Q8S2v4N5zwIPB2O07hPlNdgg0+JtBvgT/rvBaw7+qhHLis4K t59IfRCA8uUDWlSNjVQVD4WyOEddn7pw5LjIAFQEWNVRT5Dodj9qhTrfR grJYCYriBlNJZLldzHiFWmjTxL0ZLv08utEtSLWMitWROyAUk+FRVwWBA Y=;
Authentication-Results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=damien.saucez@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,331,1654552800"; d="scan'208";a="24230106"
Received: from clt-128-93-176-80.vpn.inria.fr (HELO smtpclient.apple) ([128.93.176.80]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Sep 2022 19:54:51 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: dsaucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <E7027A37-72B6-47FA-8241-C7AD0B82C345@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:54:29 +0200
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9310A97-EE04-4EAE-BA6B-D56FFFE9E8E0@inria.fr>
References: <20220907050157.B644B4C29E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAHS_mjH+ni0oqNjqMVn6Vp+Kri2WxjiQz0FyFJgvXJeUZ0-veA@mail.gmail.com> <706BA4B5-7F03-415C-B38C-A2A7F13430DC@gigix.net> <CAMMESsykBb0YWH-EhysA7zPArm2SNyFi-edM-dawsryqTQigjA@mail.gmail.com> <A83D69F4-F083-4977-A107-7DBED995EB43@gigix.net> <E7027A37-72B6-47FA-8241-C7AD0B82C345@amsl.com>
To: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/WVtc64-TOXhNnLjwmWsNEXi4kbE>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C336] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:54:59 -0000

Hello,

I am fine with the latest version, thank you for all the work done.

Regards,

Damien Saucez 

> On 15 Sep 2022, at 22:22, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Authors and Alvaro,
> 
> We have updated the text per Alvaro’s request and noted his approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9299
> 
> Please note that, since approvals came in before the queries were answered and additional changes were made, we would like to obtain approvals from both authors again. Once we have received these approvals, we will move forward with the publication process.
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.txt
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.pdf
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.html
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.xml
> 
> The relevant diff files are posted here:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
> 
> Best regards,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Sep 15, 2022, at 6:58 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 14 Sep 2022, at 17:08, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On September 14, 2022 at 9:18:23 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> This may lead confusion with the publication date.
>>>> What is we add: “… time of this writing (Editor’s Note: 2015)…”
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> I think that would lead to more confusion as the published RFC is
>>> intended to be current.
>>> 
>>> Has anything changed since 2015?  If not, "at the time of this
>>> writing" is still accurate (and no change is required).  If things
>>> have changed, we need to update the text.
>> 
>> You are right. Nothing did change.
>> 
>> Ciao
>> 
>> L.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Alvaro.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email