Re: [auth48] Correction: Re: [C381] [AD] RE: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

[Sandy Ginoza <[e-mail]>]

Hi Alvaro,

Thanks for your review and approval.  We could have been more clear that we were asking about the updates since version -13 - sorry about that. 

We’ve marked your approval on the AUTH48 page <http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9299>. 

Thanks,
Sandy 


> On Sep 7, 2022, at 7:30 AM, Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Sandy:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I looked at the diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-rfcdiff.html.  It looks (from the date) like the rfc9299.original file is based on version -13 of the draft, but -15 is the latest in the datatracker.  
> 
> Ahh, now that I look at your question I realize that you’re asking about the changes between -13 and -15.   Yes, all those changes are fine.  Thanks for checking. :-)
> 
> Alvaro. 
>  
> 
> On September 7, 2022 at 1:07:59 AM, Sandy Ginoza ([e-mail]) wrote:
> 
>> Correction to the cluster number in the subject line - this is part of C381.  
>> Apologies for any confusion!  
>> 
>> > On Sep 6, 2022, at 10:01 PM, [e-mail] wrote: 
>> >  
>> > Authors, 
>> >  
>> > While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary)  
>> > the following questions, which are also in the XML file. 
>> >  
>> > 1) <!-- [rfced] *AD, please approve the following changes: 
>> >  
>> > - updated and new text in Section 3.2 
>> >  
>> > - updates to the first paragraph of Section 3.3.1 
>> >  
>> > - removal of "using the native Internet core" in Section 3.4.3.1 
>> >  
>> > - update from "Internet global routing system" to "routing system 
>> > beyond the local LISP domain" in Section 3.5 
>> >  
>> > - removal of "Typical values of TTL defined by LISP are 24 hours" in 
>> > Section 4.1 
>> >  
>> > - new text and change from "IBGP" to "IGP" in Section 4.2 
>> >  
>> > - new paragraph at the end of Section 6 
>> >  
>> > - updates to the "To improve resiliency ..." paragraph in Section 8 --> 
>> >  
>> >