IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C336] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review

Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu> Tue, 20 September 2022 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCAAC14CE47 for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=upc-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgvmSB23f0J9 for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CDFC1522A4 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id ay36so3288905wmb.0 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=upc-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SB8MS2ks1wqNF1+wwHU40mCEWxCYLQtkbnrCNO7bEFc=; b=d+4S3Q359LOdIH2zTyWxA/BhDGxX+dv7nl2f/UT1kwj2T3s7mcnHCGIHBSvYYQHKLo JBW4wP3OhE0RF7ZW9yQftoF0217iz/MB0kFSX7l5G115+xmN/Yq1AoMMSXENXyjiAu7K YwIWKo0bovRKDJNZY5ptR8cam+61LVVoWeU4tSrUCBV3dHWqfwiOPhXoT2hKLQEN/b9C kJK1Him/1tTolFDrd30bF+U2lZcS8EzrePrxMpMhVy9XGj5hyKMhxdbDL5+XclIsTpTX Q/GxrzSZUgLTn3k8v+sjRGn2pFwAMUwFgDl4oAaSWIE2taJkB2axf2sRdolTSKVIVQN/ BBsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=SB8MS2ks1wqNF1+wwHU40mCEWxCYLQtkbnrCNO7bEFc=; b=FOrfZe9UJWOiLvZXWDVv99nFk+2r2bMCFMG19+MYxem7d9CsCAQe5hfvQvQi5uj1N5 hAXBoIttI9gtAzOyNf5VR6vfEDN/p8Um26Jqgj/TugTmk305OVYbReGKl2DJoaywLUfm 7knY8+m5KYEzs+Po68jjEvoMuttsW+IQn/EHsxux87fXp2kqlZpFd0Urg1P4yQn36Kdv 15JOZ2R7tgRL0E+d0S3Ia5yzyAHWuvHNKFhwY4JH0A0PJqWUf8M34JiNG/qGCTrGvmyp EKaWmWXCjG/bnpRGPpr62BenrNVdaYVUN0HdA9piE4773I1NN6AKxJR6jup8vtdE3tEZ K/dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0uCZD9fYOfAiL7BTx7Q19zXwq+LDFYhcJ/D35s36S4IxlkUY6A Ch57kmQ+ESDG19fucIDeDOVYvQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5qZx615fOMgGCW5khTzVtcbbseMJXVgrbzGNADadC7hvi16J9wKEaXdtStE9M2+gxIdFQa2g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c8e:b0:3b4:d224:addf with SMTP id bg14-20020a05600c3c8e00b003b4d224addfmr4010857wmb.132.1663715786515; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (168.181.77.188.dynamic.jazztel.es. [188.77.181.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4-20020a05600c290400b003a83fda1dc5sm943568wmd.44.2022.09.20.16.16.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
From: Albert Cabellos <alberto.cabellos@upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3E1EF8A0-6883-4BAF-AFDE-5BA95782FFB9@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 01:16:24 +0200
Cc: dsaucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, lisp-ads@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9F79BA6-BB35-490A-8093-6D5AF172DD04@upc.edu>
References: <20220907050157.B644B4C29E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAHS_mjH+ni0oqNjqMVn6Vp+Kri2WxjiQz0FyFJgvXJeUZ0-veA@mail.gmail.com> <706BA4B5-7F03-415C-B38C-A2A7F13430DC@gigix.net> <CAMMESsykBb0YWH-EhysA7zPArm2SNyFi-edM-dawsryqTQigjA@mail.gmail.com> <A83D69F4-F083-4977-A107-7DBED995EB43@gigix.net> <E7027A37-72B6-47FA-8241-C7AD0B82C345@amsl.com> <D9310A97-EE04-4EAE-BA6B-D56FFFE9E8E0@inria.fr> <3E1EF8A0-6883-4BAF-AFDE-5BA95782FFB9@amsl.com>
To: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/2HeMmIipvpJuJmpkYBbVx76-ORM>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C336] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9299 <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:16:33 -0000

Hi

I am ok with the latest version,

thanks for the oustanding review

Albert

> On 21 Sept 2022, at 01:08, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Damien,
> 
> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9299
> 
> Once we receive Albert’s approval, we will move this document forward in the publication process.
> 
> Best regards,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Sep 20, 2022, at 10:54 AM, dsaucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I am fine with the latest version, thank you for all the work done.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Damien Saucez 
>> 
>>> On 15 Sep 2022, at 22:22, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Authors and Alvaro,
>>> 
>>> We have updated the text per Alvaro’s request and noted his approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9299
>>> 
>>> Please note that, since approvals came in before the queries were answered and additional changes were made, we would like to obtain approvals from both authors again. Once we have received these approvals, we will move forward with the publication process.
>>> 
>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.txt
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.pdf
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.html
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299.xml
>>> 
>>> The relevant diff files are posted here:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9299-auth48diff.html (all AUTH48 changes)
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 15, 2022, at 6:58 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 14 Sep 2022, at 17:08, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On September 14, 2022 at 9:18:23 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This may lead confusion with the publication date.
>>>>>> What is we add: “… time of this writing (Editor’s Note: 2015)…”
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think that would lead to more confusion as the published RFC is
>>>>> intended to be current.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Has anything changed since 2015?  If not, "at the time of this
>>>>> writing" is still accurate (and no change is required).  If things
>>>>> have changed, we need to update the text.
>>>> 
>>>> You are right. Nothing did change.
>>>> 
>>>> Ciao
>>>> 
>>>> L.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Alvaro.
>>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email