Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review

Sarah Tarrant <starrant@amsl.com> Wed, 11 October 2023 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <starrant@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB31C1AE9DC; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECXYT4NX5UgP; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3857EC17061F; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B454243ED8; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xuUrEpdOAYZ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [75.98.103.114]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 432D9424CD05; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Sarah Tarrant <starrant@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <202310110845502889593@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:38:17 -0500
Cc: liuyisong@chinamobile.com, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, pim-chairs@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, pim-ads@ietf.org, stig@venaas.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FB309465-0E7E-4A0B-AEF7-20D664D64BB9@amsl.com>
References: <202310080846362373978257@chinamobile.com, 95CD2C7E-348F-4F62-A861-8D6DAD6407D1@amsl.com, 3C1511F0-0253-492B-9084-0ECF692F5257@amsl.com> <202310110845502889593@zte.com.cn>
To: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/aJpZC-aZ3RRlLuk0LFDqzxaaOYM>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:38:33 -0000

Hi Sandy,

We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466

Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process.
We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time.

Sincerely,
RFC Editor/st

> On Oct 10, 2023, at 7:45 PM, <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn> <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sarah, 
> I sent my approval days before. 
> If the approval was lost. Please consider this email as the approval. 
> Thank you very much!
> Best regards,
> Sandy
> 
> 
> Original
> From: SarahTarrant <starrant@amsl.com>
> To: liuyisong@chinamobile.com <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>;
> Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>;Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>;pim-chairs@ietf.org <pim-chairs@ietf.org>;RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>;auth48archive@rfc-editor.org <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>;pim-ads@ietf.org <pim-ads@ietf.org>;张征00007940;stig@venaas.com <stig@venaas.com>;
> Date: 2023年10月11日 00:35
> Subject: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
> Author,
> 
> Thank you for your reply. We have marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466).
> 
> We will assume your assent to any further changes submitted by the your coauthors unless we hear objection at that time.   
> 
> We will await approvals from Sandy prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/st
> 
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >  
> > From: Yisong Liu<liuyisong@chinamobile.com> 
> > Subject: RE: RE: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
> > Date: October 7, 2023 at 5:46:36 PM PDT
> > To: Sarah Tarrant<starrant@amsl.com> 
> > Cc: Alvaro Retana<aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, pim-chairs<pim-chairs@ietf.org>, RFC Editor<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, auth48archive<auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, pim-ads<pim-ads@ietf.org>, zhang.zheng<zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>, stig<stig@venaas.com>, Toerless Eckert<tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael McBride<michael.mcbride@futurewei.com> 
> >  
> > Hi,
> >  
> > I approved this document from my part. Thank you so much.
> >  
> > Best Regards
> > Yisong
> >  发件人: Michael McBride
> > 时间: 2023/10/07(星期六)01:48
> > 收件人: Sarah Tarrant;Toerless Eckert;
> > 抄送人: Alvaro Retana;pim-chairs;RFC Editor;auth48archive;Yisong Liu;pim-ads;zhang.zheng;stig;
> > 主题: RE: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 for your reviewApproved. Thank you so much.
> >  
> > mike
> >  
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sarah Tarrant <starrant@amsl.com> 
> > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 9:17 AM
> > To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> 
> > Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>; Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>; pim-chairs@ietf.org; RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org; Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>; pim-ads@ietf.org; zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn; stig@venaas.com
> > Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
> >  
> > Hi Toerless,
> >  
> > Thank you for your reply. We have marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466).
> >  
> > We will assume your assent to any further changes submitted by the your coauthors unless we hear objection at that time. We will await approvals from each of the parties listed at the AUTH48 status page prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
> >  
> > Thank you,
> > RFC Editor/st
> >  
> > > On Oct 6, 2023, at 11:05 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Please consider the document also approved from my part.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Toerless
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:04:08AM -0400, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> > >> Hi!
> > >> 
> > >> Please consider the document approved from my part.
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks!
> > >> 
> > >> Alvaro.
> > >> 
> > >> On October 6, 2023 at 10:05:27 AM, Sarah Tarrant (starrant@amsl.com) wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> Hello Toerless and Alvaro,
> > >> 
> > >> Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly.
> > >> 
> > >> Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do
> > >> not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us
> > >> with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form.
> > >> We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in
> > >> the publication process.
> > >> 
> > >> Updated XML file:
> > >> http://www/.
> > >> rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.xml&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride
> > >> %40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b2401
> > >> 89c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> > >> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%
> > >> 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=c6RqUaXGE%2FmY7E7uXmgCJcNjHx0YHLhKxJsJrZpJAyg%3
> > >> D&reserved=0
> > >> 
> > >> Updated output files:
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.html&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbri
> > >> de%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b24
> > >> 0189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> > >> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
> > >> D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4EQ%2BYTLzLgQDQm%2F5GmRbBAsOa%2FVuaamYQT2PuuH
> > >> uWPM%3D&reserved=0
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.txt&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbrid
> > >> e%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240
> > >> 189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> > >> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
> > >> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1btS6KMYAs4G3tOhAcgAy1s12Id6YuSskFwTgeyj9gA%3D
> > >> &reserved=0
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbrid
> > >> e%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240
> > >> 189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> > >> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
> > >> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8g5gq36o9t63kJHWyZJ2d70iHl7mmaic8uvRg4WtouE%3D
> > >> &reserved=0
> > >> 
> > >> Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Cmi
> > >> chael.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0f
> > >> ee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown
> > >> %7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC
> > >> JXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fDeWFoj6bQTI0S9H%2B%2F%2FLE4S2XcOa
> > >> q1k7gIAoX3pRTXU%3D&reserved=0
> > >> 
> > >> Comprehensive Diffs:
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.
> > >> mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2
> > >> a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7CTWF
> > >> pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
> > >> Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=aC5I3RFVJCoDlEkXv6rryNgziWFtvOBqFSS8PHTl
> > >> fKs%3D&reserved=0
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C01%7Cmicha
> > >> el.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8
> > >> ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7C
> > >> TWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXV
> > >> CI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iNKSWBsbby395PD4TU7Wnvg2rkkM0qtwRUSzd
> > >> s4NMc0%3D&reserved=0 (side-by-side diff)
> > >> 
> > >> Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view
> > >> the most recent version.
> > >> 
> > >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> > >> https://www/
> > >> ..rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9466&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride%40f
> > >> uturewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c7
> > >> 53a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
> > >> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C30
> > >> 00%7C%7C%7C&sdata=O3VdOqf5xc%2FRHY4Vm34hqszSvULJtkVRBvcrEL3hlUI%3D&re
> > >> served=0
> > >> 
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> 
> > >> RFC Editor/st
> > >> 
> > >>> On Oct 6, 2023, at 6:52 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> On October 5, 2023 at 2:11:08 PM, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> Hi Sarah!
> > >>> 
> > >>>> *Alvaro, as AD, please review the second bullet in Section 3.3.1
> > >>>> and let
> > >> us
> > >>>> know if you approve. This change is best viewed in this diff file:
> > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Yes, it's ok to take out the normative recommendation.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Just a nit: implementations don't "want" anything, they are
> > >>> programmed to do something.
> > >>> 
> > >>> s/an implementation wants to send/an implementation sends
> > >>> 
> > >>> Thanks!!
> > >>> 
> > >>> Alvaro.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > ---
> > > tte@cs.fau.de
> >  
> 
>