[auth48] RE： RE: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review

[Yisong Liu <[e-mail]>]

Hi,




I approved this document from my part. Thank you so much.










Best Regards


Yisong

 



发件人: Michael McBride

时间: 2023/10/07(星期六)01:48

收件人: Sarah Tarrant;Toerless Eckert;

抄送人: Alvaro Retana;pim-chairs;RFC Editor;auth48archive;Yisong Liu;pim-ads;zhang.zheng;stig;

主题: RE: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466  for your reviewApproved. Thank you so much.

mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Tarrant <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 9:17 AM
To: Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>; Michael McBride <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; RFC Editor <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Yisong Liu <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review

Hi Toerless,

Thank you for your reply. We have marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466).

We will assume your assent to any further changes submitted by the your coauthors unless we hear objection at that time. We will await approvals from each of the parties listed at the AUTH48 status page prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/st

> On Oct 6, 2023, at 11:05 AM, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Please consider the document also approved from my part.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Toerless
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:04:08AM -0400, Alvaro Retana wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Please consider the document approved from my part.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Alvaro.
>>
>> On October 6, 2023 at 10:05:27 AM, Sarah Tarrant ([e-mail]) wrote:
>>
>> Hello Toerless and Alvaro,
>>
>> Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly.
>>
>> Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do
>> not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us
>> with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form.
>> We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in
>> the publication process.
>>
>> Updated XML file:
>> http://www/.
>> rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.xml&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride
>> %40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b2401
>> 89c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
>> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%
>> 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=c6RqUaXGE%2FmY7E7uXmgCJcNjHx0YHLhKxJsJrZpJAyg%3
>> D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> Updated output files:
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbri
>> de%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b24
>> 0189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
>> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
>> D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=4EQ%2BYTLzLgQDQm%2F5GmRbBAsOa%2FVuaamYQT2PuuH
>> uWPM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.txt&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbrid
>> e%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240
>> 189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
>> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
>> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=1btS6KMYAs4G3tOhAcgAy1s12Id6YuSskFwTgeyj9gA%3D
>> &amp;reserved=0
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466.pdf&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbrid
>> e%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240
>> 189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
>> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
>> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=8g5gq36o9t63kJHWyZJ2d70iHl7mmaic8uvRg4WtouE%3D
>> &amp;reserved=0
>>
>> Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-auth48diff.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmi
>> chael.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0f
>> ee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474248534%7CUnknown
>> %7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC
>> JXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=fDeWFoj6bQTI0S9H%2B%2F%2FLE4S2XcOa
>> q1k7gIAoX3pRTXU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> Comprehensive Diffs:
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-diff.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.
>> mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2
>> a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7CTWF
>> pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
>> Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=aC5I3RFVJCoDlEkXv6rryNgziWFtvOBqFSS8PHTl
>> fKs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9466-rfcdiff.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmicha
>> el.mcbride%40futurewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8
>> ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7C
>> TWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXV
>> CI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=iNKSWBsbby395PD4TU7Wnvg2rkkM0qtwRUSzd
>> s4NMc0%3D&amp;reserved=0 (side-by-side diff)
>>
>> Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view
>> the most recent version.
>>
>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>> https://www/
>> .rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9466&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.mcbride%40f
>> uturewei.com%7C9aa389c5a9a74b24373508dbc687b9b5%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c7
>> 53a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638322058474404774%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
>> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C30
>> 00%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=O3VdOqf5xc%2FRHY4Vm34hqszSvULJtkVRBvcrEL3hlUI%3D&amp;re
>> served=0
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> RFC Editor/st
>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2023, at 6:52 AM, Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On October 5, 2023 at 2:11:08 PM, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sarah!
>>>
>>>> *Alvaro, as AD, please review the second bullet in Section 3.3.1
>>>> and let
>> us
>>>> know if you approve. This change is best viewed in this diff file:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html.
>>>
>>> Yes, it's ok to take out the normative recommendation.
>>>
>>> Just a nit: implementations don't "want" anything, they are
>>> programmed to do something.
>>>
>>> s/an implementation wants to send/an implementation sends
>>>
>>> Thanks!!
>>>
>>> Alvaro.
>
> --
> ---
> [e-mail]