IETF Logo Mail Archive

[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9376 <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15> for your review

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Mon, 20 March 2023 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD43C17B35F; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjE0s9JEozPd; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A44C151709; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068A14259751; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8cwGtCuEEFZ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:ed96:71c5:d0a5:eea8] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:ed96:71c5:d0a5:eea8]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B554C424FFEC; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <F0B2AD86-257A-44E2-A48E-AC3FF454D4AB@amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:35:31 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, zhangfatai@huawei.com, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86162F3D-823F-49A8-BA2F-FE181FC8FBD9@amsl.com>
References: <202303200955299067065@zte.com.cn> <1025e2e6-3f9f-3aba-eb3a-4db164bae290@gmail.com> <F0B2AD86-257A-44E2-A48E-AC3FF454D4AB@amsl.com>
To: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>, wang.qilei@zte.com.cn, Radhakrishna Valiveti <rvaliveti@infinera.com>, Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, "Sergio Belotti (Nokia)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, ccamp-ads@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/fqhg0bv_imGEkfJyAonA76GWjdc>
Subject: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9376 <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:35:37 -0000

Hi John,

As AD, please review the following changes and let us know if you approve:

- Changes in first paragraph of Section 4.2 (addition of “client signal”)
- All changes in Section 4.3
- Change from “G” to "Gbit/s” throughout document, including document title (both units were used in original)

These changes are best viewed in one of the following diff files:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9376-alt-diff.html (shows all changes)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9376-auth48diff.html (shows changes made during AUTH48)

Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv



> On Mar 20, 2023, at 1:33 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Sergio, Haomian, and Huub,
> 
> Thank you for your replies. We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9376).
> 
> We have all author approvals. We will now ask the AD to approve a few changes that are “above editorial”. Once those changes are approved, we can move forward in the publication process.
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/rv
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 20, 2023, at 3:03 AM, Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear RFC editor,
>> 
>> I do not have any further comments.
>> I support publication of this RFC.
>> 
>> Cheers, Huub van Helvoort (co-author)
>> 
>> =========
>> 
>> On 20/03/2023 02:55, wang.qilei@zte.com.cn wrote:
>>> Hi RFC editor,
>>> Thanks for your work. I reviewed the draft again and have no more changes.
>>> To the other authors, please let us know whether you have further comments, if no, please let us know whether you support the publication of the draft.
>>> Thanks
>>> Qilei
>> 
>> -- 
>> ================================================================
>> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email