Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9376 <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15> for your review

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rebecca,

I’ve reviewed all these and approve them. Thanks!

—John 

> On Mar 29, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> This is a friendly reminder that we await your AD approval of the items listed in the email below.
> 
> All questions have been addressed, and all author approvals have been received; once we receive your approval, we can move this document forward in the publication process.
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/rv
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 20, 2023, at 1:35 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi John,
>> 
>> As AD, please review the following changes and let us know if you approve:
>> 
>> - Changes in first paragraph of Section 4.2 (addition of “client signal”)
>> - All changes in Section 4.3
>> - Change from “G” to "Gbit/s” throughout document, including document title (both units were used in original)
>> 
>> These changes are best viewed in one of the following diff files:
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9376-alt-diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Bukw9vcnoRoijJxLxNSDmqq7G6QSOrIL2vevxKK0VUtOdXiDZEzTNxoabt3Un5k8aNzHD_rSAVXKSn6IEA$  (shows all changes)
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9376-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Bukw9vcnoRoijJxLxNSDmqq7G6QSOrIL2vevxKK0VUtOdXiDZEzTNxoabt3Un5k8aNzHD_rSAVWTq9byqA$  (shows changes made during AUTH48)
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/rv
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 20, 2023, at 1:33 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sergio, Haomian, and Huub,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your replies. We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9376__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Bukw9vcnoRoijJxLxNSDmqq7G6QSOrIL2vevxKK0VUtOdXiDZEzTNxoabt3Un5k8aNzHD_rSAVXsSEUoVg$ ).
>>> 
>>> We have all author approvals. We will now ask the AD to approve a few changes that are “above editorial”. Once those changes are approved, we can move forward in the publication process.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> RFC Editor/rv
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 20, 2023, at 3:03 AM, Huub van Helvoort <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear RFC editor,
>>>> 
>>>> I do not have any further comments.
>>>> I support publication of this RFC.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers, Huub van Helvoort (co-author)
>>>> 
>>>> =========
>>>> 
>>>> On 20/03/2023 02:55, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>> Hi RFC editor,
>>>>> Thanks for your work. I reviewed the draft again and have no more changes.
>>>>> To the other authors, please let us know whether you have further comments, if no, please let us know whether you support the publication of the draft.
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Qilei
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> ================================================================
>>>> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>