Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9370 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-12> for your review

[Alice Russo <[e-mail]>]

CJ,

Thank you for your reply. 

Re:
> I’m happy to use full-name on the Authors’ Addresses as you suggested.
> 
> If it’s okay, I would like to stick with CJ. Tjhai on the first page.


OK, so the document has been updated to "Cen Jung Tjhai" in the Authors' Addresses, and "CJ. Tjhai" on the first page.

The diff of only the most recent changes is here (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370-lastrfcdiff.html

Files (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.pdf
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.xml

We will continue with the publication process at this time.

RFC Editor/ar

> On May 19, 2023, at 4:52 PM, CJ Tjhai <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alice,
> 
> I’m happy to use full-name on the Authors’ Addresses as you suggested.
> 
> If it’s okay, I would like to stick with CJ. Tjhai on the first page.
> 
> Many thanks.
> 
> Best wishes,
> CJ
> 
>> On 20 May 2023, at 03:58, Daniel Van Geest <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> It is fine to use my full name and I’ve seen the full name for others elsewhere so it’s probably fine, except maybe CJ who I’ve mostly seen as CJ so I’ll leave that up to him.
>>  
>> For myself, there is something that has just come up recently.  I won’t have access to this current email address after a couple weeks.  It looks like I won’t have to give any more approvals from it, but should we update my address on the RFC-to-be?  I have updated my email addresses in datatracker.  If we should update my address, please use [e-mail]
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>  
>>  
>> On 2023-05-19, 9:35 PM, "Alice Russo" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>  
>> Authors,
>>  
>> A final question as we prepare to publish this document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.html) as an RFC:
>>  
>> May the authors' full names be included in the Authors' Addresses (as is typical in RFCs)? If so, are the names below correct?   A reply from one of you is sufficient at this point.
>>  
>> CJ, is it your preference to use "Cen Jung Tjhai" in the Authors' Addresses (as shown onhttps://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/12078271), while "CJ. Tjhai" appears on the first page? Or, do you prefer "CJ. Tjhai" in both locations?
>>  
>>  
>> Suggested text (changed from C. Tjhai, M. Tomlinson, G. Bartlett, S. Fluhrer, D. Van Geest, and O. Garcia-Morchon):
>>  
>> Authors' Addresses
>>  
>>   Cen Jung Tjhai   
>>   Post-Quantum
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Martin Tomlinson
>>   Post-Quantum
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Graham Bartlett
>>   Quantum Secret
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Scott Fluhrer
>>   Cisco Systems
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Daniel Van Geest
>>   ISARA Corporation
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Oscar Garcia-Morchon
>>   Philips
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>>  
>>   Valery Smyslov
>>   ELVIS-PLUS
>>   Email: [e-mail]
>>  
>> Thank you.
>> RFC Editor/ar
> 
> PQ Solutions Limited (trading as ‘Post-Quantum’) is a private limited company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 06808505.
>  
> This email is meant only for the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
> 
> For more information about Post-Quantum, please visit www.post-quantum.com.
> 
> In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy notice at www.post-quantum.com/privacy-policy/ to learn about how we use this information.