Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9370 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-12> for your review

["Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <[e-mail]>]

I approve these changes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 9:09 AM
> To: [e-mail]; Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; mt@post-
> quantum.com; [e-mail]; Valery Smyslov <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Tero Kivinen
> <[e-mail]>; Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>; auth48archive@rfc-
> editor.org; Graham Bartlett <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9370 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-
> 12> for your review
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Thank you for your replies to date.  We are currently awaiting approvals
> from two authors, as indicated at http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9370.
> 
> Once we have received all approvals, we will move this document forward in
> the publication process.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/mf
> 
> 
> > On Apr 22, 2023, at 3:32 AM, Graham Bartlett <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I approve this RFC for publication.
> >
> > As per;
> >
> > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email
> > stating that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY
> > ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:34 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > *****IMPORTANT*****
> >
> > Updated 2023/02/22
> >
> > RFC Author(s):
> > --------------
> >
> > Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> >
> > Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
> > approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> > If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
> > available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> >
> > You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
> > (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
> > your approval.
> >
> > Planning your review
> > ---------------------
> >
> > Please review the following aspects of your document:
> >
> > *  RFC Editor questions
> >
> >    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
> >    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
> >    follows:
> >
> >    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> >
> >    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> >
> > *  Changes submitted by coauthors
> >
> >    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
> >    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
> >    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> >
> > *  Content
> >
> >    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
> >    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
> >    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
> >    - contact information
> >    - references
> >
> > *  Copyright notices and legends
> >
> >    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
> >    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
> >    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> >
> > *  Semantic markup
> >
> >    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
> >    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
> >    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
> >    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> >
> > *  Formatted output
> >
> >    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
> >    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
> >    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
> >    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> >
> >
> > Submitting changes
> > ------------------
> >
> > To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
> > the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
> > include:
> >
> >    *  your coauthors
> >
> >    *  [e-mail] (the RPC team)
> >
> >    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
> >       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
> >       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> >
> >    *  [e-mail], which is a new archival mailing list
> >       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
> >       list:
> >
> >      *  More info:
> >
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxI
> > Ae6P8O4Zc
> >
> >      *  The archive itself:
> >         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> >
> >      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
> >         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
> >         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
> >         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
> >         [e-mail] will be re-added to the CC list and
> >         its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
> >
> > You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> >
> > An update to the provided XML file
> >  — OR —
> > An explicit list of changes in this format
> >
> > Section # (or indicate Global)
> >
> > OLD:
> > old text
> >
> > NEW:
> > new text
> >
> > You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
> > list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> >
> > We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that
> > seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion
> > of text, and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can
> > be found in the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a
> stream manager.
> >
> >
> > Approving for publication
> > --------------------------
> >
> > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email
> > stating that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY
> > ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> >
> >
> > Files
> > -----
> >
> > The files are available here:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.xml
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.html
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.pdf
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.txt
> >
> > Diff file of the text:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370-diff.html
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370-rfcdiff.html (side by
> > side)
> >
> > Diff of the XML:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370-xmldiff1.html
> >
> > The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own
> > diff files of the XML.
> >
> > Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.original.v2v3.xml
> >
> > XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates
> > only:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9370.form.xml
> >
> >
> > Tracking progress
> > -----------------
> >
> > The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9370
> >
> > Please let us know if you have any questions.
> >
> > Thank you for your cooperation,
> >
> > RFC Editor
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC9370 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-12)
> >
> > Title            : Multiple Key Exchanges in IKEv2
> > Author(s)        : C. Tjhai, M. Tomlinson, G. Bartlett, S. Fluhrer, D. Van Geest,
> O. Garcia-Morchon, V. Smyslov
> > WG Chair(s)      : Yoav Nir, Tero Kivinen
> >
> > Area Director(s) : Roman Danyliw, Paul Wouters
> >
> >