IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9311 <draft-ietf-shmoo-hackathon-08> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Tue, 06 September 2022 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0918DC1533BC; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hzukR6vooe7C; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6AAC15257E; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B724243EFA; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DKzDtVRdqs2U; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:948c:3272:15c6:3fc6]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B50424B440; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <EFEE0C04-2A92-4BC0-A375-0125CC23BEA5@eggert.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 08:10:13 -0700
Cc: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "shmoo-ads@ietf.org" <shmoo-ads@ietf.org>, "shmoo-chairs@ietf.org" <shmoo-chairs@ietf.org>, "mknodel@cdt.org" <mknodel@cdt.org>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <25BF1476-5449-44B7-B8A1-7F332112D4C0@amsl.com>
References: <20220831232326.B51AB4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com> <969A0106-2F68-4415-9904-A9F91BF27AA4@cisco.com> <9AE3548F-234D-4766-A3E7-61F891D8FA24@amsl.com> <EFEE0C04-2A92-4BC0-A375-0125CC23BEA5@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/sesX59XdVrAvxHQk4MgDXsDF1y4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9311 <draft-ietf-shmoo-hackathon-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 15:10:19 -0000

Hi Lars,

Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9311

Best regards,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Sep 5, 2022, at 12:17 AM, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2022-9-2, at 21:55, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
>> *Lars, as the AD, please review and confirm that the Implementation Status section should remain in this document.
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9311-auth48diff.html
> 
> confirmed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email