Re: [Autoconf] DAD, link-locals, two drafts and making up my mind

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

YEs, I support this draft draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04 to 
become a WG item.

It is a comprehensive overview of past descriptions of autoconfiguration 
  mechanisms.

Once it is a WG item I will have more remarks on it.

I will not condition the adoption of this WG item by the deadline of 
when we start to work because this WG already has many WG items about 
which I am not sure whether they have been adopted or not by the WG.

This draft is good work which should be adopted.  It should have been 
adopted long time in the past.  If this WG wanted to deliver only _one_ 
  WG item then I'd prefer it to be this draft.

Alex

Charles E. Perkins a écrit :
> 
> Hello Carlos,
> 
> Yes, it is the same protocol that you described in your draft.
> I think you draft should be considered important background
> material for understanding the issues.
> 
> Once we get to work, that is.
> 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> 
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
>> (text skipped)
>>  
>>>> I have to read that solution now.  Where is it?
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> I'm having a little trouble finding my old documents.
>>> This is work done well over five years ago.
>>>
>>> I'll send another message when I find them.
>>>     
>>
>> Maybe it is included in the survey draft we wrote in the past:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Otherwise, let me know to include it in future revisions of the draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>  
>>> Regards,
>>> Charlie P.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     
> 
>