IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Autoconf] Regarding Baccelli/Townsley Internet-Draft

Ricardo Schmidt <super.ismiti@gmail.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <super.ismiti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F473A6960 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIL9cQ7LTaE5 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f50.google.com (mail-pw0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13693A679C for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so435997pwi.29 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=LiLVV13KNbtq9oX28xKa8izI49bDuZOSl5d8rxfAMTY=; b=lfeCtXQDZqUoanoUWH4ADxaJqLOmbu9Dv0oEBBz4qo3TdBGVdIgL7yuecGUGqKLamR MNTn9iMrTKs0/Sy/Q5ClQstq5xu4Dz99+RhfIuPBTVlVZC7t9bVL+IwekcK9w0g8dVzM vV1vShARwKh1apCpczs+eYuNUwvOu0FWBjicA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=I7j0p60hc4Gc09jqlw7fOxs/gcqesCm+3QiqGFO/OWCo3wL4YJnX3ZJNemuPrZqrWS n3gp3G9jViEz0Fz0y8oLdTDx4mTuXZehp4pGQVihbusEDFmwsgOAYjdTrhx8b45BiROv FoA1BQ82cIINhfYItvW5Vg+2GWJvJ+Oezfdns=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.75.14 with SMTP id x14mr89015wfa.151.1256870978051; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:49:38 -0300
Message-ID: <db92277f0910291949h732311cbn131f4b1ddc86b4ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ricardo Schmidt <super.ismiti@gmail.com>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Autoconf] Regarding Baccelli/Townsley Internet-Draft
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:49:25 -0000

Dear group members,

I am in accordance with what is stated in the Internet-Draft
adhoc-addr-model-00 by Baccelli/Townsley.

Using the same email, I would like to ask: does the group only
consider stateless address autoconfiguration? Or is stateful
addressing also an alternative?

Regards,
Ricardo Schmidt.

PS.: some may be surprise with my email, but yes I am following the
group discussions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email