IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Regarding Baccelli/Townsley Internet-Draft

"Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Fri, 30 October 2009 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABB03A67C0 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QpDlkO8-dwx for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723443A679C for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=tqRc+xW/OkHNT9DXFUp5glcPn92AmCvlfiGpk2W1RGd0q17LBaceIMKGtCdmgXKT; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [99.51.74.16] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1N3hpm-0001DQ-Qt; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:07:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4AEA586C.9080104@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:24 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Organization: Wichorus Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ricardo Schmidt <super.ismiti@gmail.com>
References: <db92277f0910291949h732311cbn131f4b1ddc86b4ea@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <db92277f0910291949h732311cbn131f4b1ddc86b4ea@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956abb457f1b4332f524360f0ca8c899c2269cc8e737040f7a6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.51.74.16
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Regarding Baccelli/Townsley Internet-Draft
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:07:11 -0000

Hello Ricardo,

We haven't gotten to the point of deciding whether to
use stateful or stateless address configuration yet.
We're still trying to get started, although I guess
things are finally resolving so that we will see some
progress soon.

My guess is that eventually solutions will be
developed for both varieties, depending upon
the network configuration and attachment.

Regards,
Charlie P.



Ricardo Schmidt wrote:
> Dear group members,
>
> I am in accordance with what is stated in the Internet-Draft
> adhoc-addr-model-00 by Baccelli/Townsley.
>
> Using the same email, I would like to ask: does the group only
> consider stateless address autoconfiguration? Or is stateful
> addressing also an alternative?
>
> Regards,
> Ricardo Schmidt.
>
> PS.: some may be surprise with my email, but yes I am following the
> group discussions.
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email