[AVTCORE] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex-06: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

I don't know RTP at all, but found that document very clear and easy to read,
so thank you for that.

Only one trivial comment:

   If the packet contains solely one-byte extension ids, the 16-bit RTP
   header extension tag MUST be set to 0xC0DE to indicate that the
   encryption has been applied, and the one-byte framing is being used.
   If the packet contains only two-byte extension ids, the header
   extension tag MUST be set to 0xC2DE to indicate encryption has been
   applied, and the two-byte framing is being used.

This text doesn't say what to do if the packet contained a mix of 1 and 2 byte
extension-ids.  My presumption is that this isn't allowed.  I will leave it to
the authors to decide whether to clarify this, but acknowledge that it may be
obvious to everyone familiar with RTP ...

Regards,
Rob