Re: [AVTCORE] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740931287A0 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDKMdIwOP2qA for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x232.google.com (mail-yb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8023D128D3E for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 84so4555926ybe.0 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gWI9e76BZCugwhl6EW5O7PQZmacEQ/BaIHyUbotEbCg=; b=wloJjxtK6sKhBzD3njpWL5idR75c1YuZSUsfiWKBPEf2VMcCW2PtCiqrC8ijGkxzhs EKlMtull2dL6bjgaCc3yJFWVnHHKmU5/D8mhu23ITnybSBmhjaEhQqkR2V5pM3mLouRK RNnYdeVoFTjZQ/uYpcYEyEbSDuHgw9aokL3/faPbrNW1hWPJwuk2D6X1pfCUa2LyqiXU CRGOXSKLh/TEupBOZJoPWYi1YouRoU6iueaw89VGKsLx3ZrxAPaPjcTczRWn7zcmVlja KDmS80pXDbfAuoKxp5R5vKs0notyh5R1V6MLEbkSusC8EL2fvL+jvJd3P/I1RzqjrBnQ EFfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gWI9e76BZCugwhl6EW5O7PQZmacEQ/BaIHyUbotEbCg=; b=e1RrYfyqOrIQbGziu1g5iDU/zYsK8zmuoQ7stue7qybqqDDbQSFSG8XthI716tO6rz BXO5SAxKq24A0WaMc2FEH8Qt4+Z0Bybb8tjUptrOccGt8odqDE2Hzu0z0Ww6hYDuObP+ FGQ4hVDlTrzQxYzBGiQipDeWaKRIr/Vf4FCFnckoY+h5QrTdcyv55wNOF/4uDNMHtfBg 5ig/l5Ld0MyCXBWaZUNWIqEK3RqhaSMCD26V38+tzpmr6I/fjYLYJtmKtYr9JhwaG0hY DCxHOXxaWx3foc4i8Y+mc8AikWMED8qClkUABgCRpSA3y0IlQl4w94161hgFZd6piS+e Nxqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzCP3fkvMtYGA9tNmMLE5ncKdCrGOA+BhDI9JJiBxzfZUrGzTD5 W+HSqc7XuXTQZI5mgQjRoUzP1EbpYpoz
X-Received: by 10.37.214.12 with SMTP id n12mr1747909ybg.122.1498137699757; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.215.9 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7DBC1F@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <149791884335.23828.13769788810069405479.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7DBAE6@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CABcZeBP7qGEtoeS36h2RyEMiXkCUnB5yEhX3L2kZSYGpTZXcqw@mail.gmail.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7DBC1F@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:20:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOA+TtwRM_cJGMcMG8YqFxUuKhXEVF2gn=Bs69Bc19gTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "avtcore-chairs@ietf.org" <avtcore-chairs@ietf.org>, "magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis@ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fcb706b4d3e05528c5dce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/P9tr7sHEqhOICAmcpJ-RTa5bO-w>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:21:44 -0000

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:

> Want to use only one byte header extensions for the audio for routing
> audio on low bandwidth link.
>

But mixed mode allows this.



> Anyhow many of the RTP header extensions will be different between the
> audio and video
>

I don't see how this is relevant.

-Ekr


> Roni
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com]
> *Sent:* יום ה 22 יוני 2017 15:54
> *To:* Roni Even
> *Cc:* The IESG; avtcore-chairs@ietf.org; magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com;
> draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis@ietf.org; avt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12:
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>
>
>
> Yes, I understand that, but why would you not want to mix? I assume merely
> because your implementation can't handle it, right? Is there some other
> reason?
>
>
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> inline
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com]
> > Sent: יום ג 20 יוני 2017 03:34
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis@ietf.org; Magnus Westerlund; avtcore-
> > chairs@ietf.org; magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com; avt@ietf.org
> > Subject: Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12:
> (with
> > DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> >
> > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.
> html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Why are you allowing this extension to be "normal" in BUNDLE?
> > If you're bundling, you should be modern enough to handle mixed, no? Why
> > not make life simple?
> >
> >
> [Roni Even] It is not a question about handing mixing if you bundle but if
> there is a use case where you do not want to mix for one of the m-lines.
> This is the discussion since even if you use normal you can still do
> identical (for example by having the allow mixing at the session level) but
> not the opposite.
>
>
>