Re: [AVTCORE] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I understand that, but why would you not want to mix? I assume merely
because your implementation can't handle it, right? Is there some other
reason?

-Ekr


On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Roni Even <[e-mail]> wrote:

> inline
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: יום ג 20 יוני 2017 03:34
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: [e-mail]; Magnus Westerlund; avtcore-
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12:
> (with
> > DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> >
> > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.
> html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Why are you allowing this extension to be "normal" in BUNDLE?
> > If you're bundling, you should be modern enough to handle mixed, no? Why
> > not make life simple?
> >
> >
> [Roni Even] It is not a question about handing mixing if you bundle but if
> there is a use case where you do not want to mix for one of the m-lines.
> This is the discussion since even if you use normal you can still do
> identical (for example by having the allow mixing at the session level) but
> not the opposite.
>
>
>