Re: [AVTCORE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4514)

"David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com> Thu, 29 October 2015 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FF81B2E3F for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTua67uYYqb5 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5281B2E3B for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 05:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3391; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446121159; x=1447330759; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sFWN/tX4TcBA3kLeL3pI7GnjG6m+bkieFajr6HByPH8=; b=Fvhr3rd+T/aphgyG2i9494zhUpCdSC7xrRPsP95+CtFbT5CXK6kykjFg y/Tmp9hRx4kQYYt0KUQPkVhU4PMJUXpZhgWjXumeEQ/GvsamIfWWllFoq b9HVgvpcNmi5HcitN03NKDtJvS6faB1/Syh9lmX0iGdwwuWQrBUVLAUyO k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D6AQA/DjJW/5hdJa1EGoM2U28GvyABDYFaIYV4AoEpOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENQEBAQR5DAQCAQgRBAEBKAcyFAkIAgQBDQUIiCgNO8RtAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIt1gUCDUAcGhCcFh0UJhgZ4hBqDXQGNHYFghD+WHQEfAQFCghEdgVZyAROEY4EHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,214,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="40273222"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2015 12:19:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9TCJIlV032725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:19:18 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:18:52 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-004.cisco.com ([173.36.7.14]) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com ([173.36.7.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:18:52 -0500
From: "David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: Karl Norrman <karl.norrman@ericsson.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "mbaugher@cisco.com" <mbaugher@cisco.com>, "elisabetta.carrara@ericsson.com" <elisabetta.carrara@ericsson.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mats_N=E4slund?= <mats.naslund@ericsson.com>, "ben@nostrum.com" <ben@nostrum.com>, "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, "keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "roni.even@mail01.huawei.com" <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4514)
Thread-Index: AQHREj6l41AH9VGQT0mnl4FgmudCNJ6CtP4A//+ujtA=
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:18:52 +0000
Message-ID: <0cf5fbd330f448ad96bffb9d5d985677@XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com>
References: <20151029114025.CAB65180092@rfc-editor.org> <33E51946CDE71249AF9D86CE4D8966B428AA4AE3@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <33E51946CDE71249AF9D86CE4D8966B428AA4AE3@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.10.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/Vkjnc_MjAFMIXaM8GG55f_DHVrA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 08:11:13 -0800
Cc: "bernhard.kirchen@lancom.de" <bernhard.kirchen@lancom.de>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4514)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:19:21 -0000

+1

David McGrew, PhD
Cisco Fellow
Advanced Security Research and Government Group, Cisco Systems


-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Norrman [mailto:karl.norrman@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:11 AM
To: RFC Errata System; mbaugher@cisco.com; elisabetta.carrara@ericsson.com; David McGrew (mcgrew); Mats Näslund; ben@nostrum.com; alissa@cooperw.in; keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com; roni.even@mail01.huawei.com
Cc: bernhard.kirchen@lancom.de; avt@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4514)

Hello!

I agree that the figure would look better if the proposed correction is made.
On the other hand, I can't really see that the current figure could be misinterpreted by an implementer, so I consider this to be an editorial correction.

BR
Karl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: den 29 oktober 2015 12:40
> To: mbaugher@cisco.com; elisabetta.carrara@ericsson.com; 
> mcgrew@cisco.com; Mats Näslund; Karl Norrman; ben@nostrum.com; 
> alissa@cooperw.in; keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com; 
> roni.even@mail01.huawei.com
> Cc: bernhard.kirchen@lancom.de; avt@ietf.org; 
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4514)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3711, "The 
> Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3711&eid=4514
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Bernhard Kirchen <bernhard.kirchen@lancom.de>
> 
> Section: 3.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The format of an SRTP packet is illustrated in Figure 1.
> 
>    0                   1                   2                   3
>  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The format of an SRTP packet is illustrated in Figure 1.
> 
>  0                   1                   2                   3
>  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The bit index second decimal digit is shifted by two characters. These 
> digits should align with the zeros in the second line.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please 
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. 
> When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to 
> change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3711 (draft-ietf-avt-srtp-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
> Publication Date    : March 2004
> Author(s)           : M. Baugher, D. McGrew, M. Naslund, E. Carrara, K. Norrman
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Audio/Video Transport
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG