[AVTCORE] Comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-04

曹宁 <caoning@sttri.com.cn> Fri, 21 October 2011 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <caoning@sttri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6616E1F0C68 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.286
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.643]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7R76GDOlqqV for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CE921F8500 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip?218.2.129.2? (entas5.inner-hermes.com [10.27.101.5]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 491C13E4096 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:35:37 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.10.27.101.5.2043138298
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ip<218.2.129.2> ([218.2.129.2]) by 21CN-entas5(Yuwen filter gate 10.27.101.5) with ESMTP id 1319178937.17030 for avt@ietf.org ; Fri Oct 21 14:35:38 2011
0/X-Total-Score: 3:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<avt@ietf.org>, score=<1319178938JmaTTxTTWTTnTTaTXzxWnanB88088E88Q88b8Gk0EQbJ>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:35:37 +0800 (CST)
From: =?UTF-8?B?5pu55a6B?= <caoning@sttri.com.cn>
To: avt <avt@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <29600986.23381319178937356.JavaMail.root@ent11>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2478_21687857.1319178937106"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 218.2.129.2
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
Subject: [AVTCORE] Comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-04
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:41:56 -0000

Hi, 
I have read draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-04 and believe it is ready for publication.
I have only one suggestion for its clarity of draft.
In the section 5.2, it mentions using "chunk"
to convey correlation information, would it better to use SDEC item to replace it?
Also would it better to emphasize the new SDES item is required.
 
Regards!
Ning Cao  
ShangHai Research Institute of China Telecom Corporation Limited