Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt

This version of the draft has some editorial fixes and makes various minor clarifications. I believe it's ready for another WG last call, along with draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options.

Colin

On 7 May 2013, at 13:20, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution
> 	Author(s)       : Colin Perkins
>                          Magnus Westerlund
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt
> 	Pages           : 9
> 	Date            : 2013-05-07
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia
>   sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP),
>   and the associated RTP control protocol (RTCP), do not mandate a
>   single media security mechanism.  Guidelines for designers and
>   reviewers of future RTP extensions are provided, to ensure that
>   appropriate security mechanisms are mandated, and that any such
>   mechanisms are specified in a manner that conforms with the RTP
>   architecture.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/