[AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (3913)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 06 March 2014 09:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5494E1A019D for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:53:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zEosJlrGJ7i9 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12D1A019A for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CFAFC7FC39D; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:53:36 -0800 (PST)
To: mcgrew@cisco.com, ekr@rtfm.com, rlb@ipv.sx, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, even.roni@huawei.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140306095336.CFAFC7FC39D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 01:53:36 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/_zcU0pCCbcw8PwrVyWvY2GoLmmE
Cc: avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (3913)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:53:43 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5764, "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5764&eid=3913 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Section: 5.1.2 Original Text ------------- Arriving packets may be of types RTP, DTLS, or STUN [RFC5389]. ... | B < 2 -+--> forward to STUN ... If the value of this byte is 0 or 1, then the packet is STUN. Corrected Text -------------- Arriving packets may be of types RTP, DTLS, or STUN [RFC5389]. STUN messages with methods identifiers of 1280 or higher cannot be demultiplexed. ... | B < 20 -+--> forward to STUN ... If the value of this byte is less than 20, then the packet is STUN. Notes ----- This is a tricky one. We can't distinguish all STUN message types, because - at least in theory - new message types >= 1280 can be added to STUN, which could collide with DTLS. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5764 (draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Publication Date : May 2010 Author(s) : D. McGrew, E. Rescorla Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Audio/Video Transport Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (39… RFC Errata System
- [AVTCORE] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC57… RFC Errata System