Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-03.txt

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2651A016A for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:05:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkhIW2KrZxh9 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DF61A0166 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb32-b7f4c8e0000012f5-3a-530dae5c8494
Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 47.89.04853.C5EAD035; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:05:32 +0100
Message-ID: <530DAE5C.4030707@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:05:32 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
References: <20140214225105.12651.48135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140214225105.12651.48135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupiluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rjd2HW+wwfQjPBYve1ayOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY/2rkywFjfIVV3u2sDcw/hTvYuTkkBAwkXj04hYThC0mceHe ejYQW0jgBKNE5+OsLkYuIHs5o8SCu3tZQBK8AtoSCya+ACtiEVCVaHz8nhHEZhOwkLj5oxEs LioQLLHzwG9GiHpBiZMzn4D1iggoSeyYtI25i5GDQ1jAWeLGbnWIXY4SHf9WgpVzCjhJfJmw iB2kREJAXKKnMQgkzCygJzHlagsjhC0v0bx1NjNEq7ZEQ1MH6wRGwVlIls1C0jILScsCRuZV jJLFqcXFuelGBnq56bkleqlFmcnFxfl5esWpmxiB4Xlwy2+jHYwn99gfYpTmYFES573OWhMk JJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgZH1JE95wjODj2HzEjU+LriaceSo/DLuplXLSqcw XRY6N8VUc+/fntyQ4wre99TENs0/K7ri9+O7u54Vx05lqzwsYPZvWZJp+MptT/x791ySaZ7V f/DbVe6PzlqO5cYPvgaubC02dw6eo/D9nd3J78t2P+ktn873vbM/V4TDf+EV433fYje/3/1V iaU4I9FQi7moOBEA98W2ZB0CAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/i1SHYCVh_tY4CunOXVigvClxdiM
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-03.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:05:39 -0000

WG,
(As Author)

For your information this update was a quite significant one. We added a
description of the scheduling algorithm we tried out to the previous
meeting. We also clarified parameter settings for AVP and AVPF RTCP
compatibility. We have unfortunately expanded the open issues list in
doing this work.

   At this stage this document contains a number of open issues.  The
   below list tries to summarize the issues:

   1.  Do we need to provide a recommendation for unicast session
       joiners with many sources to not use 0 initial minimal interval
       from bit-rate burst perspective?

   2.  RTCP parameters for common scenarios in Section 6.2?

   3.  Is scheduling algorithm working well with dynamic changes?

   4.  Are the scheduling algorithm changes impacting previous
       implementations in such a way that the report aggregation has to
       be agreed on, and thus needs to be considered as an optimization?

   5.  An open question is if any improvements or clarifications ought
       to be allowed regarding FB message scheduling in multi-SSRC
       endpoints.

I recommend if you haven't already done so to review the latest draft
and think about the above open issues. We really like some input on them.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

On 2014-02-14 23:51, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Sending Multiple Media Streams in a Single RTP Session
>         Authors         : Jonathan Lennox
>                           Magnus Westerlund
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Colin Perkins
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 22
> 	Date            : 2014-02-14
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document expands and clarifies the behavior of the Real-Time
>    Transport Protocol (RTP) endpoints when they are using multiple
>    synchronization sources (SSRCs), e.g. for sending multiple media
>    streams, in a single RTP session.  In particular, issues involving
>    RTCP Control Protocol (RTCP) messages are described.
> 
>    This document updates RFC 3550 in regards to handling of multiple
>    SSRCs per endpoint in RTP sessions.  It also updates RFC 4585 to
>    clarify the calculation of the timeout of SSRCs and the inclusion of
>    feeback messages.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-03
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------