Re: [AVTCORE] IANAs payload type number registry and RFC 5761

[Kevin Gross <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 2014-02-26 04:03, Kevin Gross wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Magnus Westerlund
> > <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     2. The "Reserved for RTCP conflict avoidance" in this table is not
> up to
> >     date. Instead
> >
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters/rtp-parameters.xhtml#rtp-parameters-4
> >     provides the list of the RTCP types that has actually been
> registered.
> >     Subtract 128 from the RTCP Packet Type value to find the
> corresponding
> >     PT value with collision risk. For further information see RFC 3551
> and
> >     RFC 5761.
> >
> > The critical reference here seems to be RFC 5761 section 4. I'm not sure
> > why calling out RFC 3551 is necessary.
>
> Yes, in this case for RTCP conflict avoidance RFC 5761 is the applicable
> reference.
>
> However, for the third bullet the inclusion of RFC 3551 is relevant as
> that applies when the RTP/RTCP multiplexing is not used.
>

Yes, the third bullet does call out RFC 3551 (section 3). I don't think a
RFC 3551 reference is necessary in bullet 2.

>
> >
> > Updating the not attached to the registry looks like the right approach
> > to me. Thanks Magnus for summarizing this and putting together a
> proposal.
> >
>
> As I understand the WG are acceptable to this approach. I will take the
> opportunity to try to get this in place with IANA during the coming week.
>
> I'd be happy to help draft or review a drafted note.