Re: [AVT] Re: Review requested: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-toffset-04.txt

I agree. The proposed changes address my comments sufficiently.

regards,
-Qiaobing

Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
> Here is what I hope is the last word on the topic: Dave's actions.
> 
> Dave Singer wrote:
> -------------------
> 
> OK, changed the first sentence:
> 
> In the RTP specification <xref target="RFC3550"/> network jitter
> calculations are based on the presumption that packets are
> transmitted essentially in accordance with their RTP timestamps.
> 
> and added
> 
> The RTP specification does not define a transmission timestamp, and
> nor does this specification.  This specification merely provides
> information on the relationship between the relative transmission
> times and relative RTP timestamps.
> 
> and
> 
> The reported transmission time T1 of a packet with timestamp R1 and
> an offset of O1, from the above equations, is T1 = R1+O1 (though of
> course the transmission time values only have meaning when two or
> more are compared).
> 
> and
> 
> The content is exactly that number of interarrival jitter
> calculations, calculated using the same formula as for sender and
> receiver reports, but taking into account the transmission offsets
> for the streams (if any);  that is, using the values T1=R1+O1, T2
> etc. as defined above, instead of R1, R2 etc..
> 
> I then re-named the symbols to be in accord with the RTP spec (i.e.
> using Si for RTP timestamp, not Ri).
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt