Re: [AVT] RAMS rev'ed to -09

Hi Ali,
When can we expect a new revision of the cname. I assume it will address the
comments from Dan Wing. 
Once we receive it we can look at adding it as a WG item.
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:05 PM
> To: avt@ietf.org
> Subject: [AVT] RAMS rev'ed to -09
> 
> We submitted -09 version for the RAMS draft. This version includes the
> changes we agreed on in the last meeting as well as the fixes for all
> the comments posted in the list since the first wglc. The authors would
> like to specifically thank Colin Perkins for the suggested text
> changes.
> 
> Here is the link for diff (it may take a few mins before -09 shows up):
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp
> 
> As agreed on in the last meeting, we would like to ask the wg co-chairs
> to start the 2nd wglc.
> 
> Also note that while the new cname draft is not a normative reference
> in RAMS, the need for it was mentioned by several individuals in the
> list. Basically, the guidelines in 3550 need to be updated. The initial
> version was taken positively by many folks and we received several
> offline comments. A new rev is coming up soon and we want the AVT WG to
> consider this draft for adoption so that we can finish it along RAMS.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-begen-avt-rtp-cnames
> 
> Thanks, acbegen.
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt