Re: [babel] info-model: calculated and received metrics

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Wed, 17 July 2019 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA571200FD for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zm9K5FdcEx4U for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763D81200C5 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1563396641; bh=TxxSN5sDlDK95touq46YtBu+wTIrLFPeToBIjzM4Gk4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=wJkXDOCUOZIPd21uS1Ltg78JxPa4aQDz4BcdCYDl7xFTSIBUWIfZZlAAgFv7WNk2u wt8rlVaFontotbvIYQIs1lrfoTgm4POQjI5Jqc66mQzjcQ1EojAaYPfBxmWKbz6Ugz 2JFkcp8UP6uWYRXUz4nhrmASViBOpE9xuU2gtIiK3LjZNga0Tj1YdvvEx3c9UaM35D g+ynqhFPcBjZfBdPx/TknjsQQFgpngUC4Sm3+efZ0zLEPvjNdHUTw7KoRGJJfD6aVX z3jIaU5SuUhZ/NAjLoBRxswhmcJIZtLSbz/zObkeHWOVOrEH6bjcn5K7NnMwxs1WJv sQbNNgJV48FZg==
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, 'Juliusz Chroboczek' <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: 'Babel at IETF' <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E22A14C@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E151182@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87h8al9ibp.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E20EEFD@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E22A14C@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 22:50:40 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87ftn475cv.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/00hWnfYLpEpl9GBk8PP7YeIUC7Y>
Subject: Re: [babel] info-model: calculated and received metrics
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:50:46 -0000

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> writes:

> I've heard no response to this question. I've confirmed that in TR-181
> I do have a problem (a uint with value of 0 or NULL will be
> transmitted in a TR-181 data model as 0), because it defines "NULL"
> as:

In this case, wouldn't NULL be signified by the value being absent?

-Toke