Re: [babel] Comments about rfc7298bis

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5671204DA for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcEQDVoHWPDq for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23EFE1267BB for <babel@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id w43LtcU4016439; Thu, 3 May 2018 23:55:38 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07013EB226; Thu, 3 May 2018 23:55:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id QU7HgI_CxztA; Thu, 3 May 2018 23:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32328EB21E; Thu, 3 May 2018 23:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 23:55:37 +0200
Message-ID: <8736z89zfq.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <163258f779c.1272194bf35512.5113105590240148496@ovsienko.info>
References: <87fu4huzgj.wl-jch@irif.fr> <1628e298460.cd82970b35329.4945272877112645380@ovsienko.info> <87muyi3eqi.wl-jch@irif.fr> <16296069fec.e13616a29759.8282754479379679955@ovsienko.info> <878ta1y8k0.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87sh7aaqpw.wl-jch@irif.fr> <16322fb2d40.b754c16418709.3274574589997739202@ovsienko.info> <87po2dzntf.wl-jch@irif.fr> <163258f779c.1272194bf35512.5113105590240148496@ovsienko.info>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 03 May 2018 23:55:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5AEB855A.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5AEB855A.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5AEB855A.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/0RsbzdMBCy05dAlE3tfL9fcSND0>
Subject: Re: [babel] Comments about rfc7298bis
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 21:55:43 -0000

> Per each packet: one TS/PC TLV and at least one HMAC TLV (as 7298 explains it)
> Per each IHU TLV: one TS/PC sub-TLV (as 7298-bis explains it)

> If you read the full I-D and confirm you have done that, I will
> appreciate that.

I have read the I-D, although I skipped over the parts that merely restate
what is in 6126.  I still don't understand how you deal with more TC/PC
sub-TLVs than can fit in a packet.

-- Juliusz