IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Comments about rfc7298bis

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 02 May 2018 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0102612D95E for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsrDrvVFMfzX for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC6012D959 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id w42Hs5rK031584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 May 2018 19:54:05 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/75695) with ESMTP id w42Hs7CU018616; Wed, 2 May 2018 19:54:07 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FF0EB227; Wed, 2 May 2018 19:54:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id ekPw3qWQ2pIN; Wed, 2 May 2018 19:54:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lanthane.irif.fr (unknown [172.23.36.89]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1D8BEB21E; Wed, 2 May 2018 19:54:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 19:54:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87sh7aaqpw.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <878ta1y8k0.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <87fu4huzgj.wl-jch@irif.fr> <1628e298460.cd82970b35329.4945272877112645380@ovsienko.info> <87muyi3eqi.wl-jch@irif.fr> <16296069fec.e13616a29759.8282754479379679955@ovsienko.info> <878ta1y8k0.wl-jch@irif.fr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Wed, 02 May 2018 19:54:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Wed, 02 May 2018 19:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5AE9FB3D.005 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 5AE9FB3F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5AE9FB3D.005 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5AE9FB3F.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5AE9FB3D.005 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5AE9FB3F.001 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/XbmpzM_-gldBFh73TiJr-vEXink>
Subject: Re: [babel] Comments about rfc7298bis
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 17:54:10 -0000

>>> What happens if the number of neighbours is so large that the complete set 
>>> of TC/PC echos does not fit in a full-size packet? 

>> The same thing happens as if there is no authentication at all and the
>> number of neighbours is so large that the complete set of IHU TLVs does
>> not fit.

> I'm not sure I understand.  The set of IHUs can be easily split across
> multiple packets -- the absence of an IHU does not imply that the
> neighbour has been dropped.  If I understand correctly (correct me if I'm
> wrong), your draft requires sneding the full set of IHU+TC/PC echo in
> a single packet.  If I'm right, then a mechanism is needed to deal with
> overflow, no?

Denis,

Did I miss an e-mail?  I don't see an answer to the above.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email