IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-babel-source-specific (2018-03-26 to 2018-04-09)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 23 July 2018 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9185130DE1 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRvns8hmUu9B for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C0F130DED for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 72-v6so1226359itw.3 for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2hoOo+7oQsNDPcCeFX/p64/HCj8wLSn5BOCC+Wp+KGo=; b=fDSxEhKN/VucQm90t0KXKhuzMqzIJyNJFcR1KQPJuh5v7SSupeRF+mzbCBFXUFUhvr yeJaL20tn0T4PmjwcVsRt7EP2/tguwONmR1zfbYoAFCKcgGHgsZY77A65YkJzIRaPFjk bFJAeUFZxLWoHKKtEy9LyRQVhnygjZXrK8jkWeCrI1D6rsDXh0/a2I6S061OMJD1BCeY zo2P1DlIGZrzQpHpKzixJDEcYmCViE4sI1w9QOxQ0PC1WXIor6jH+LDZPz+/XbxlWz04 TIoaiK4O1FWAKK8gxXChltATVN2ryU4flv0dg3ukQxKHMqM/9B3wltb6BgvH08XIAENl 9yuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2hoOo+7oQsNDPcCeFX/p64/HCj8wLSn5BOCC+Wp+KGo=; b=tFyC5eldK9SEW4Upd7QragxNXQPlbETI9jDibn1h/r5uuqX8yQDXnhzFTPsSrpi0Dn JTi2O1fVvuxDC68VY4xQZvVB/F8M4hYri/DZu+39b3s+Dh89F/3picdm2iNXH2CW8PG7 mTgrJvsj/NDrngXZHBsIpXLNicudVvm5ZCfEwrJMGmm9NT9hMpBtW6ObXP1fYO4W5rqN tZtZT3rzP29eT7Z96/C+TOyIdw+9RDNy1crBAIkTov5WAudwK8WE5JAl04zs6MIhq1qO HGxJEMJ+gMKbnk1Vbd0bln9cBojjvPSOdnnvgFHPJVYEki6dPHpmnSf7u1esxkoNhdjF i+wQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEHZufQUhtdVL33FA/xVLjw3ILkWg0aFT7a51Dkm+zqJIYULWJT dZ0oMjeYJD0mOFQwVoLFYg5vImUckpXkgQhCnmemRQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd6Sv81SQJQItmQB5N6qt8H4vfAW3txRIC7XZGg8XylgMATeEUS23AVX3hpxCKzRkhXm9xqzEGyhhIihlabOfM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:4c9b:: with SMTP id q27-v6mr10830976jad.38.1532349660536; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:b442:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw75Aqz=wVqENND0FTOgNc5e5y=DjHnum9Tp604mmNVzsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEHUmjUcY7PS0eVDuPr8YHaJG4t+CyoxzMR15821X+-Vsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFa+ZFfYScDxbsCbe3bX=p6w+YKpq0eXa+tjtYZDzvwyA@mail.gmail.com> <163a3eefcb3.105e54392539813.8869059599002671510@ovsienko.info> <0B1F8607-E0D3-4725-A9F2-2ACF41207D57@irif.fr> <163cabe6d49.1115744068931.3357457871401802835@ovsienko.info> <87d0x6u1yd.wl-jch@irif.fr> <164c1f6c305.de4e0cfa319563.445636890330531708@ovsienko.info> <878t632m5q.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAA93jw75Aqz=wVqENND0FTOgNc5e5y=DjHnum9Tp604mmNVzsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:40:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=KexDJrQ3gDiq4Qw_3x+cXxo8-U2uVZJwq8C2yLzugWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, babel-chairs@ietf.org, Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003038f60571a9f5cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/JN521mgrRZYHmgeYbClIUJahZDQ>
Subject: Re: [babel] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-babel-source-specific (2018-03-26 to 2018-04-09)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:41:04 -0000

HNCP isn't working for you to distribute IPv6 prefixes?

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> In my deployed babel network... I am dreading the source specific
> change. But I've been prepared to have that flag day for three years,
> and the ietf processes make me crazy. I have no less than 6 deployed
> versions of babel in the field (and I mean, in the field, in trees,
> and on rooftops), spread across 40+ routers, it will take me months or
> years to replace them all... and the deployment strategy juliusz has
> outlined is acceptable.
>
> In part due to the lack of a good ipv6 address distribution mechanism
> (slight dig), very little of my network is ipv6 enabled, and the sad
> way I assign source specific addresses now (ip route show |  grep
> "from" | pickaddresseslikeslaacdid), ipv6 source specific connectivity
> either comes back on the reflash/reboot or it doesn't - and ipv4 keeps
> working. The ipv6 stuff has largely not escaped the lab due to the
> delays in standardization.
>
> due to the address assignment problem, I think very few babel
> installations are using ipv6 all that much, except in non source
> specific ways.
>
> Let's just get it over with and get the documents AND code out there
> already. openwrt 18.06-rc2 is out now and it would be great to start
> testing al the new stuff before it goes final. Warn people in the
> README.
>
> If this were OSPF or BGP or ISIS I'd care more, but babel's deployment
> is at least 3 orders of magnitude smaller than those.
>
> ship it. Move on.
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for reading.
> >
> > Our pleasure, as always.
> >
> > Denis, I've read your mail twice, and I do not understanding what you are
> > proposing.  Could you please succintly and clearly explain what it is
> that
> > you recommend that the working group should do?
> >
> > -- Juliusz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > babel mailing list
> > babel@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-669-226-2619
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email