[babel] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-05: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 09 February 2024 22:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: babel@ietf.org
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB555C151099; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:23:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.5.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <170751740088.35387.8240067772701126548@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 14:23:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/fwKZD3a9RA4r5K1otml0d7808G0>
Subject: [babel] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 22:23:21 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Shivan Sahib for the SECDIR review. ** Section 3.3. We suggest the following algorithm to achieve that. When a node receives a packet containing a Hello and an IHU, it SHOULD compare the current local time t2 with the Origin Timestamp contained in the IHU; Consider if you want to formally “RECOMMEND” this algorithm, rather than “suggest”.
- [babel] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker