IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-11: (with COMMENT)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 05 August 2019 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CB61200CC; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPOvb36OcZ5O; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E1112000E; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id r6so88049126oti.3; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EIITd1TCkMon+7/5K3dci7FVgVnEdUhQ1KoOQ/7zhEE=; b=scWmB6so+dYhiLjbrqTiACNYCj1HXaRN/63RPTxPX5+Lnpw/aDHXbI7CxvcMM4X0YO x8bhhN1YM1FtiPpWr+4zNtY46RM3NhGL5udssSuH4aHgk5S4OSJtsbJogiLxvKwxMdiL n4OV8e+kwVlFyCXOzKcf5Q3mvAGz5Xh3DquDoq3KvPxt2gd/rfc9W/nf6pjB37PeXxMe o9SATTW0YAK53hg/mfy4wo3VRIWrhH3iWbNaNGuMNsrSX2gvQAXjK6cioYQKWH81+3CM tO7w89aKqLLP2O7Tt04hGNNIRO4jWKTt9g3K2D8tPNAUt5X39P1zynoUN3Sz5wT+p74w Q7nQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EIITd1TCkMon+7/5K3dci7FVgVnEdUhQ1KoOQ/7zhEE=; b=o965m7XQKYNlmkEKzRoctlcmydt7jkKXw82HZaOAsGq4hwkax+JEVftW7OdKJcKfg+ HYV3GqgJ5qsHISOFZuQcYX0D64w2FK0SN5OaiIDJnmZIynaY6FtPBp+1zHw4XfxZiLjO u9JUa6VD/bDmh70uANJqebI7M6tvp1L5Fi3ANzntdwtUqHzHdDQ086a2KghxG8vAEoMJ t7WoDUbujuWu8rlJ6Lxnwt9oZYAUMcKfajb+CHFs4+RqGY0z/GKxJ7iz8rbwISp4ochR 7xma7P6vc4+MHNRZ8dVWSiQeoAWLo/SraxC4xiY3RG/lyGWaiw+IrOZj/oMbwdKkK0KF uk+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV59U5gArSxM/4m0LbxVgIbyCzphi1UZH1wDeaA3xYtxBTfWsVq DXRWcioFah3bKTTwo1MuaPYDaw3H2WDaCYBtk6Y3Jg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXGPjDxeX+5ToJMyJsyMe+cVVPsPp3a03VSu+K67UregUJ8eOsoG/mBOg8tOYl5QfFlp9k22iqch++Ial0X9A=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8411:: with SMTP id i17mr587332ion.83.1565048684586; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156498851376.24465.4531172446015994141.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <87v9vblt6j.wl-jch@irif.fr> <518548BD-80F5-4F02-9362-EC61D0D5CA7B@cisco.com> <87mugnllz9.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87mugnllz9.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 19:44:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFyjCNAH80wQ8_hbXnsnavKUkdamFKVBbOMokNbA=i6sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis@ietf.org>, "babel-chairs@ietf.org" <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/geHe65feE_z4ZAhp1klaWcNvhvY>
Subject: Re: [babel] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 23:44:47 -0000

Speaking as an individual, I'm OK with that addition.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:34 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>
> > Please state somewhere that the two options are available; perhaps by
> > simply copying the text of your reply in your document.
>
> I've added the following paragraph to Section 3.1:
>
>    The protocol's control traffic can be carried indifferently over IPv6
>    or over IPv4, and prefixes of either address family can be announced
>    over either protocol.  Thus, there are at least two natural
>    deployment models: using IPv6 exclusively for all control traffic, or
>    running two distinct protocol instances, one for each address family.
>    The exclusive use of IPv6 for all control traffic is RECOMMENDED,
>    since using both protocols at the same time doubles the amount of
>    traffic devoted to neighbour discovery and link quality estimation.
>
> List: this adds a SHOULD to the draft.  Since this reflects implementation
> practice, I am fairly confident that it also reflects our consensus, please
> yell if I'm wrong.
>
> -- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email