Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Sun, 02 June 2019 20:45 UTC
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CE11200F1 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUnuj4rMmV_3 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a00:7660:6da:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA02012008C for <babel@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1559508296; bh=jR6X4ydOrEb8cTuBsLHlWp3cGcVE67W0j4klGy+oF/8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=tdcP62QolGAi3TG9S+F5xkGpUh7fw2BrOZZm4fi+v2SVdbRgmWf+yIXchg3T3ULhx KJLcFc2+0Gz9reUmIm2jPOIAYB4Stzo7egHEooBMUaTuGQ5iAuXJacWBQWMl6LHjkZ l+jcrXdr3aX0E9xewpPjjmS9FisI+p5/TmZvwRvS5+f1KF4jnEYcOqHf5xiJlpOi7p 442iS3m+o2cVZXpsbmDslLskIVpZu00WLtSY/Nae1DKaZcT60pyrg6Wzrp02gUF5OA qlsrsGGtBTXlJDIbRpYLOStJw+GOCuy8SGk7YwdDi7kenNS4vj0jxMFbOjs1gT9/qw tHdZ8yLPQ2Xig==
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7cy=1x+kqP1EJi6fXMaSZE8mCrJHLr40UDGGO72yH_OA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPDSy+45_gEo=SfLWnODa6jMqnUdC9a10nhL6ZxRLh7EXabxaw@mail.gmail.com> <87tvda7omc.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAPDSy+7cy=1x+kqP1EJi6fXMaSZE8mCrJHLr40UDGGO72yH_OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:44:56 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <877ea3iunr.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/kbkqhiBE91dr8zXmF-mw1CM-eKk>
Subject: Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 20:45:04 -0000
David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> writes: > Now, speaking as implementor of Babel (as opposed to draft author), I > strongly believe that a new port will make a difference in the success > of this protocol. Juliusz phrased the reasons why quite well. +1 (even though I currently have no plans to implement the DTLS extension)... -Toke
- [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports David Schinazi
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports Dave Taht
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports David Schinazi
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports Donald Eastlake
- Re: [babel] Babel over DTLS and UDP ports Juliusz Chroboczek