IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] charter comments and discussion

"Philipp S. Tiesel" <phils@in-panik.de> Fri, 31 March 2017 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <phils@in-panik.de>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A78A12953C for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlwUtnJL_U0x for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from einhorn-mail.in-berlin.de (einhorn-mail.in-berlin.de [IPv6:2001:67c:1400:1010::20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378EF1293F9 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-From: phils@in-panik.de
Received: from x-berg.in-berlin.de (x-change.in-berlin.de [217.197.86.40]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2VIVqvG028259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:31:52 +0200
Received: from [2001:bf0:c801:101:a055:9c23:c270:473c] by x-berg.in-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <phils@in-panik.de>) id 1cu1Ky-0004Pv-5u; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:31:52 +0200
From: "Philipp S. Tiesel" <phils@in-panik.de>
Message-Id: <EF4E98E2-97F3-48F4-8EA6-082D0D2B28E8@in-panik.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC40A92E-7E9B-4B15-8C57-8940D8947564"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:31:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <15B815DE-FD49-4B66-B844-B3728A255CA6@darou.fr>
Cc: "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>, David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
References: <15B815DE-FD49-4B66-B844-B3728A255CA6@darou.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/7inbmFr5k5q2ExfYmj-Bo72JMls>
Subject: Re: [Banana] charter comments and discussion
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:32:02 -0000

> On 30 Mar 2017, at 23:35, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr> wrote:
> 
> - Makes sure that packets received by src (resp. dst) are identical to packets originated by the dst (resp. src).
> - Only aggregates traffic "between consenting adults", i.e., when both src and dst endpoints are aware of what is going on.


Well said – let’s make that a little more explicit:
 - you should not be stuck with banana when you are able to use a transport protocol
   that can do better (e.g. MPTCP or MP capable Quick some time in the future)
 - When using banana, you should be able to get rid of the reordering and the delay 
   it causes (e.g. if your transport protocol can really tolerate reordering - not in a TCP way) 

AVE!
  Philipp S. Tiesel / phils…

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email