Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of multipath)

Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com> Sat, 04 February 2017 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CCB127058 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGcgsy5ThOAi for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3F4126CD8 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CZZ65552; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 06:51:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 06:51:35 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:50:09 +0800
From: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of multipath)
Thread-Index: AdJdA2lYXkbqbDOFQbGKAFgQ1qTtuQg7pqqAAAH84AAALb23UA==
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 06:51:24 +0000
Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A63A1C49@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A6386E6A@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <C328BFD1-A2B7-4E95-956A-D553A8167922@gmail.com> <f5bc7430-45dd-c5a6-d376-9d349d40a373@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <f5bc7430-45dd-c5a6-d376-9d349d40a373@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.146.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.589579F8.00B4, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: f49f829f0acb312289d3bab283f73fdd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/JZWSdtPLWGi9i3uEQLAyJQDj9cQ>
Cc: "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of multipath)
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 06:51:39 -0000

Hi Joe, all,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 12:46 AM
> To: Margaret Cullen; Mingui Zhang
> Cc: banana@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of
> multipath)
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> So am I to understand that the "problem statement" is:
> 
>     - given two cooperating devices, how to manage a set of bonded links
> between them?
> 
> Isn't that what routers already do?

There is one key difference. What is routers nowadays doing is per-flow load balancing using hashing rather than flow splitting across this set of bonded links and then reordering. 

Thanks,
Mingui

> 
> (yes, I know that I've glossed over the fact that these "links" might be tunnels -
> because we have dozens of ways of doing that already)
> 
> Joe