Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of multipath)
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 13 February 2017 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A9129547 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZGzVTCnpu-z for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26BD2129559 for <banana@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.184.84] ([128.9.184.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1DHkwZE013202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:46:59 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, "Zuojing (2012 Laboratories)" <jing.zuo@huawei.com>
References: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A6386E6A@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <C328BFD1-A2B7-4E95-956A-D553A8167922@gmail.com> <f5bc7430-45dd-c5a6-d376-9d349d40a373@isi.edu> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A63A1C49@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <99F04B22-01AC-476C-A15A-1696B686A953@isi.edu> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A63A1D7D@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <9c6339a0-be7a-5b26-acc8-b8b13108eeca@isi.edu> <956518A5-6371-4959-BBB8-1C4B9604DA0D@gmail.com> <E5EB799F-F922-4AB3-A77D-E8EFF1866A2E@gmail.com> <4AD902A48032F745A3D7866E6CAE8CB064BBD1D8@DGGEMM521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <029e994f-e5e8-08a2-6015-eb8dd2d692fb@isi.edu> <4AD902A48032F745A3D7866E6CAE8CB064BBD532@DGGEMM521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <E26769A7-8B3A-4D8B-8828-93F9E596B03C@rfc1035.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <b28ace89-b709-136e-b839-b1a61fda320c@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:47:00 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E26769A7-8B3A-4D8B-8828-93F9E596B03C@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/LAiAxsvw9a2_iZ0jBY_CyY7Q3gU>
Cc: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>, Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>, BANANA WG/BoF <banana@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, next-hop selection of multipath)
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:47:44 -0000
+1 I raised the point more to indicate that MPTCP is not relevant to the charter. Joe On 2/13/2017 1:32 AM, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 13 Feb 2017, at 09:23, Zuojing (2012 Laboratories) <jing.zuo@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> BANANA needs not to distinguish subflows from TCP flows only if Service Providers require BANANA boxes to do such exemption For example, Service Providers may purposely let those flows already being conducted by other multipath technologies be “bypassed”. > Surely these sorts of issues are for the WG to discuss once it has been created? They shouldn’t be relevant to the matter at hand, namely the new WG’s charter. >
- [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next-hop… Mingui Zhang
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Mingui Zhang
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Mingui Zhang
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Zuojing (2012 Laboratories)
- Re: [Banana] diff (banana load distribution, next… Joe Touch
- [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, next… Zuojing (2012 Laboratories)
- Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, … Jim Reid
- Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, … Michael Menth
- Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, … Joe Touch
- Re: [Banana] 答复: diff (banana load distribution, … Joe Touch