[BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Sat, 11 June 2011 01:21 UTC

From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:21:36 -0700
Message-ID: <04bd01cc27d5$e87375e0$b95a61a0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: Acwn1eguJRRv7kJmQ+Kd8tITmtQ4Rw==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org, 'Dave Thaler' <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Subject: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81
Precedence: list

Hi.  

For IETF81, we need to have draft agendas to our area director to get agenda
time. 


  **********************************************************
  **  If you are planning to present a non-working group  **
  **  document during the BEHAVE session at IETF81, send  **
  **  email to behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org by            **
  **  Wednesday, June 15.                                 **
  **********************************************************


>From our working group active documents list 
at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/behave, I expect we would have an 
agenda covering these items:

* draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis, no presentation (was WGLC'd)

* draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements, 20 minutes

* draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic, 20 minutes

* draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis, no presentation

* draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat, no presentation

* draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat, no presentation (was WGLC'd)


of the "Related Active Documents (not working group documents)", here are my
thoughts:

* draft-boucadair-behave-bittorrent-address-sharing -- I believe this was
going to be published AD-sponsored, unless there is interest in the working
group on this document?  If folks want to look at it, and decide if they
could provide peer review, we might consider adopting this as a WG document.
Please let me know.

* draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-logging was requested to become a WG document.
There was some feedback which I believe has not yet been integrated into the
document.  After that feedback is integrated, a presentation might be a good
idea to determine if there is interest in adopting this as a WG document.

* The various multicast documents with -behave- in their names should wait
for the outcome of the multicast BoF, to see if there is interest in moving
forward with multicast translation.


If there are other things to discuss, send the chairs email.


Right now, it appears we might only need 1.0 or 1.5 hours of meeting time.

-d

Re: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81 David Harrington
[BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81 Dan Wing