Re: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81

Hi,

FYI.
Your email discusses drafts going as AD-sponsored rather than as WG
drafts.

The IESG has been having discussions about AD-sponsored drafts.
These take up an inordinate amount of an AD's time, and a number of
ADs prefer not to do AD-sponsored drafts as a result.
I am one of those ADs.

It is better to have drafts handled through WGs, to get community
review.
If the relevant community (the WG) thinks a draft isn't worth working
on, I am not likely to want to sponsor such a draft.

Just so authors and the WG know ...

David Harrington
Director, IETF Transport Area
ietfdbh@comcast.net (preferred for ietf)
dbharrington@huaweisymantec.com
+1 603 828 1401 (cell)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan Wing
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 9:22 PM
> To: Behave WG
> Cc: behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 'Dave Thaler'
> Subject: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE presentations at IETF81
> 
> Hi.  
> 
> For IETF81, we need to have draft agendas to our area 
> director to get agenda
> time. 
> 
> 
>   **********************************************************
>   **  If you are planning to present a non-working group  **
>   **  document during the BEHAVE session at IETF81, send  **
>   **  email to behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org by            **
>   **  Wednesday, June 15.                                 **
>   **********************************************************
> 
> 
> From our working group active documents list 
> at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/behave, I expect we would have an 
> agenda covering these items:
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis, no presentation (was WGLC'd)
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements, 20 minutes
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic, 20 minutes
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis, no presentation
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat, no presentation
> 
> * draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat, no presentation (was WGLC'd)
> 
> 
> of the "Related Active Documents (not working group 
> documents)", here are my
> thoughts:
> 
> * draft-boucadair-behave-bittorrent-address-sharing -- I 
> believe this was
> going to be published AD-sponsored, unless there is interest 
> in the working
> group on this document?  If folks want to look at it, and 
> decide if they
> could provide peer review, we might consider adopting this as 
> a WG document.
> Please let me know.
> 
> * draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-logging was requested to become 
> a WG document.
> There was some feedback which I believe has not yet been 
> integrated into the
> document.  After that feedback is integrated, a presentation 
> might be a good
> idea to determine if there is interest in adopting this as a 
> WG document.
> 
> * The various multicast documents with -behave- in their 
> names should wait
> for the outcome of the multicast BoF, to see if there is 
> interest in moving
> forward with multicast translation.
> 
> 
> If there are other things to discuss, send the chairs email.
> 
> 
> Right now, it appears we might only need 1.0 or 1.5 hours of 
> meeting time.
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> 