Re: [BEHAVE] Per-interface NAT in mobile networks
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 25 October 2010 15:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C4F3A6A6E; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OP993h5metRA; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1733A6A65; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCA92CC38; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:22:33 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bebUmBBdv4Hc; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:22:32 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C4D2CC2F; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:22:32 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4CC5A0B8.4010805@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:22:32 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
References: <8806_1288018027_4CC5986B_8806_213602_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F32F984DC3C6@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <8806_1288018027_4CC5986B_8806_213602_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F32F984DC3C6@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: BINET David NCPI/NAD/TIP <david.binet@orange-ftgroup.com>, IBRAHIM Houmed RD-CORE <houmed.ibrahim@orange-ftgroup.com>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>, BERNIER Olivier RD-CORE <olivier.bernier@orange-ftgroup.com>, "draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite@tools.ietf.org" <draft-arkko-dual-stack-extra-lite@tools.ietf.org>, Softwires list <softwires@ietf.org>, MOUQUET Antoine RD-CORE <antoine.mouquet@orange-ftgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Per-interface NAT in mobile networks
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:20:50 -0000
Mohamed, Thanks for your interest on this! For everyone's information: I have asked the document to be AD sponsored through to the IETF to become an RFC. I think Ralph was willing to do it, AD reviews and so on still obviously pending. So there may not be a need to adopt it at the working group. Review comments would be highly appreciated from everyone, of course. Mohamed: were you thinking that we should have a also some more mobile network specific guidance about this? Perhaps that could be a separate draft (or even a 3GPP spec). I have been trying to keep my draft at the general level. But I do know that there are people who want to use it different circumstances, and some of those may benefit from additional specification. I know of at least one such case already, maybe yours is a second one. Jari
- [BEHAVE] Per-interface NAT in mobile networks mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [BEHAVE] Per-interface NAT in mobile networks Jari Arkko
- Re: [BEHAVE] Per-interface NAT in mobile networks mohamed.boucadair