Re: [BEHAVE] draft-nishitani-cgn and draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby

["Dan Wing" <[e-mail]>]

We didn't get strong feedback either way, so let's keep them separate.  I
have asked the authors of draft-nishitani-cgn to submit the document as a
working group document.

-d


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 2:33 PM
> To: 'Behave WG'
> Cc: '[e-mail]'; 'draft-nishitani-
> [e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'; 'draft-xu-
> [e-mail]'
> Subject: draft-nishitani-cgn and draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby
> 
> Question for the working group:
> 
> Would it be useful to combine the "Redundancy Mechanisms" section of
> draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby, which discusses hot and cold
> standby,
> with draft-nishitani-cgn?
> 
> 
> For reference, Section 4 of draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby is at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby-
> 05#section-4
> and draft-nishitani-cgn is:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishitani-cgn-05
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Wing [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:34 AM
> > To: 'Behave WG'
> > Cc: '[e-mail]'; 'draft-nishitani-
> > [e-mail]'
> > Subject: adopting draft-nishitani-cgn-05, as agreed in Maastricht
> > (IETF78)
> >
> > As discussed at our meeting in Maastricht, to meet BEHAVE's
> milestone:
> >
> >   "Dec 2010	  	Submit to IESG: large scale NAT requirements
> (BCP)"
> >
> > we plan to adopt draft-nishitani-cgn-05 as a working group document,
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishitani-cgn-05.  There were no
> > objections
> > in Maastricht.
> >
> > If there are objections to adopting that document to meet that
> > milestone, please email the chairs.  Otherwise we will adopt this
> > document on Wednesday.
> >
> > -d
> >