IETF Logo Mail Archive

[BEHAVE] draft-nishitani-cgn and draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F273A6C62 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3YmmM6hhGRb for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C1F3A6DC7 for <behave@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAPOpoEyrR7Hu/2dsb2JhbACVO4xcca07nHiFRASEUA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,244,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="240348730"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 21:33:19 +0000
Received: from dwingWS ([10.32.240.196]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8RLXJmB015444; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:33:19 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>
References:
In-Reply-To:
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:33:20 -0700
Message-ID: <085601cb5e8b$9b34e070$d19ea150$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
thread-index: ActY6gMv/BAGoMFtQ+yVKIQi6pmwNgFoPTNw
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby@tools.ietf.org, behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-nishitani-cgn@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [BEHAVE] draft-nishitani-cgn and draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:32:41 -0000

Question for the working group:

Would it be useful to combine the "Redundancy Mechanisms" section of 
draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby, which discusses hot and cold standby,
with draft-nishitani-cgn?


For reference, Section 4 of draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby is at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-behave-stateful-nat-standby-05#section-4
and draft-nishitani-cgn is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishitani-cgn-05

-d


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: 'Behave WG'
> Cc: 'behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org'; 'draft-nishitani-
> cgn@tools.ietf.org'
> Subject: adopting draft-nishitani-cgn-05, as agreed in Maastricht
> (IETF78)
> 
> As discussed at our meeting in Maastricht, to meet BEHAVE's milestone:
> 
>   "Dec 2010	  	Submit to IESG: large scale NAT requirements (BCP)"
> 
> we plan to adopt draft-nishitani-cgn-05 as a working group document,
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishitani-cgn-05.  There were no
> objections
> in Maastricht.
> 
> If there are objections to adopting that document to meet that
> milestone, please email the chairs.  Otherwise we will adopt this
> document on Wednesday.
> 
> -d
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email