RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 06 June 2007 00:48 UTC
Return-path: <behave-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvjh1-0002Tq-Rt; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:07 -0400
Received: from behave by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvjh0-0002Tl-Ao for behave-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvjh0-0002Td-1E for behave@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:06 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvjgz-0002uy-EU for behave@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:06 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2007 17:48:05 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,387,1175497200"; d="scan'208"; a="159466842:sNHT51613839"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l560m4cE024529; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:48:04 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l560m4V1014324; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:48:04 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Bharat Joshi' <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>, behave@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:48:04 -0700
Message-ID: <0c4301c7a7d4$57b9d3d0$c2f0200a@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <1181018908.3830.22.camel@magadha>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
Thread-Index: AcenlsStn7P1nesASeuv0mRq8IaSYgAOv47A
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=6294; t=1181090884; x=1181954884; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[BEHAVE]=20Re=3A=20[MBONED]=20FW=3A=20WGLC=3A=20draft -ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt |Sender:=20; bh=1Kp7bqijb3HovcktRfUYZ5JvZuMDpeZtPmRFhhrNeaE=; b=ciFm9YjYG1KquYULURlEtbPSbp2LkWDy8BjSJRcWDbixfQFgXi7wxRP+Ta+njf8BrtEEegFp bViMbelW1Qnd5hBodo6wrF8Dv7DRO0ttfQoAVvU8TDn0wx5cnTu5ThHM;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 20f22c03b5c66958bff5ef54fcda6e48
Cc:
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: behave-bounces@ietf.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bharat Joshi [mailto:bharat_joshi@infosys.com] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:48 PM > To: behave@ietf.org > Subject: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: > draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt > > > Hi Dan, > > I have couple of questions and suggestions: Thanks for your comments! > > The BEHAVE working group concluded its WGLC of > > draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06 with no comments received. > > I would like > > MBONED and MAGMA to please take a look at this draft prior > . to its submission > > to IESG. > > > > Please send replies to behave@ietf.org. Thanks! > > * In section 4.2, why is it that a NAPT device implementing this draft > needs to aggregate IGMP message only for IGMPv3? I think if it is > implementing 'RFC4605', it will anyway do the aggregation. It's my understanding that things will work -- somewhat sub-optimally -- with IGMPv1 or IGMPv2 without the NAT doing aggregation of IGMPv1/v2 messages and blindly just forwarding them upstream. If my understanding is incorrect, please let me know (it may well be; multicast is not my expertise). > * In case of IGMPv3, why is it that aggregation is a MUST? > Also I think > when one of the hosts behind the NAPT generates LEAVE and another > generates JOIN simultaneously, the session will be UP till the > group-timer timesout and as JOIN is also received, it will be updated > and so session will always be UP. Am I mixing the session created in > NAPT with the state in upstream router? Slightly after that requirement in the document is this explanation: > > Failure to do this aggregation will cause undesired > temporary blackholing of multicast traffic. For example, > consider two hosts behind the same NAPT. If one host is > joining a session at the same time another is leaving the > session, and the NAPT merely relays the join and leave > upstream, the session will be terminated and the join and > leave announcements do not comply with section 5 of <xref > target="RFC3376"></xref>. > > * Typo "lesaving the session" -> "leaving the session" Thanks, fixed. > * In section 4.4, though complete Multicast Range is 224/4 but out of > this range 232/8 is used for Source Specific Multicast or > Single-Source > Multicast. So is the following statement syntactically correct > > "Any-sosurce multicast (ASM) uses the IP addresses in the 224.0.0.0 - > 239.255.255.255 range [IANA-ALLOC]." > > What I meant is that it looks to be incorrect to call this > range as ASM range. You're right. I pulled this from the Terminology section of RFC3569 ("An Overview of Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)"). I have adjusted my document so that it describes the ASM space as 224/8 through 231/8 and 233/8 through 239/8 (with a hole for 224/8). > * In section 4.4, > > a. This UDP mapping SHOULD be destroyed when the host leaves > that host group. > > How do we find out that host has left the group? Please > correct me if I am wrong. > We are talking about a host behind the NAPT device > generating Multicast data traffic [UDP traffic]. A multicast host does > not need to join the multicast group [By sending an IGMP join message] > to send multicast traffic to that group. So how does NAPT > finds out when > it can destroy this mapping and so this mapping will have to timeout > before it can be removed. Ah, good point which I hadn't considered. I have removed that requirement. > Thanks & Regards, > Bharat > > PS: I am not subscribed to 'behave' mailing list so please > reply-all or include my id in your reply. -d > > -Dan Wing > > chair, BEHAVE working group > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:47 PM > > > To: 'behave@ietf.org' > > > Subject: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt > > > > > > The working group last call is starting now for "Multicast > > > Requirements for a Network Address Port Translator (NAPT)", > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-multicas > > > t-06.txt: > > > > > > This document specifies requirements for a Network Address > > > Translator (NAT) and Network Address and Port Translator (NAPT) > > > that supports any-source multicast or single-source > multicast. A > > > multicast-capable NAPT device that adheres to the > requirements of > > > this document can optimize the operation of multicast > > > applications that are generally unaware of multicast NAPT > > > devices. > > > > > > This WGLC will finish on Thursday, May 31 (two weeks from today). > > > > > > If this WGLC is successful, I will ask for review by the > > > MAGMA working group and mboned@lists.uoregon.edu prior to > > > submitting to IESG. > > > > > > -d > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MBONED mailing list > > MBONED@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned > > > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION > intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by > e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not > to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents > to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This > e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every > reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not > liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any > virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus > checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys > reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all > messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent > to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys > e-mail system. > ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** > > > _______________________________________________ > Behave mailing list > Behave@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave _______________________________________________ Behave mailing list Behave@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
- [BEHAVE] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06… Dan Wing
- [BEHAVE] WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt Dan Wing
- [BEHAVE] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave… Manfredi, Albert E
- [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave… Bharat Joshi
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-… Prashant Jhingran
- RE: [BEHAVE] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Dan Wing
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Dan Wing
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-… Dan Wing
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Bharat Joshi
- RE: [BEHAVE] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Dan Wing
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [BEHAVE] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Brian Haberman
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Alvaro Fernandez
- [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Marshall Eubanks
- [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Brian Haberman
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Alvaro Fernandez
- [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Brian Haberman
- [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Brian Haberman
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Brian Haberman
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Alvaro Fernandez
- [BEHAVE] RE: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Alvaro Fernandez
- [BEHAVE] AW: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft… Leymann, Nicolai
- RE: [BEHAVE] AW: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Dan Wing
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-be… Dan Wing
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Dan Wing
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:dr… Alvaro Fernandez
- RE: [BEHAVE] Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW:WGLC:dra… Alvaro Fernandez