Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB861205E1 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-bRfyixcdd7 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50E0B1205CC for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id v20so8150977qtv.12 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GesKcgAkmnRJGjIgRCfQmM+KIyMpWK2WMt3JbKnuVcY=; b=j8I4jf0oG4FIbHFq2GwfkWKDLXFJzo0mviAy/LxjhF9MXXc9rJBE+5pchFSQIyk7le LeN5TJXANeYdMAWKVJEB8SINX1K43Uz2fe0kVBD03KnBEhKEEIQxeGm/Fy6p3CE/r801 k7k0w2EwNCvpL7u2e5aDK9tSY2kGJ8+gSqP+v3mxQt8dGax1DZTOCB+97nGZncV1Fqwb 78F7iSHzN37xLqh+jHGGUjX48LMZwydsuUJT/cP2GIaFOcF1hM+fiNfjId05pXxjlF5K lre82+CZddzkTF28i+21Hof1wWi/xJ4aA58pXViK8GR1tYQQN/KKsxebgb1DRC7Xnou3 WjAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GesKcgAkmnRJGjIgRCfQmM+KIyMpWK2WMt3JbKnuVcY=; b=ZHEqzhGfPBAXD8kJCceooZIiJCnLLfzOOW3LjDoq8ggdQBKou2US9hVkS+Q9IC5Q9J t3QC/Ee/LN3SyXPz/z/XkDHxa8u8wYyEGbpcajt3R8ecVFC/THawOpPNmub1FvlUsZuH BoicOZcz4CZ6L6C2vBgS8JeQamCWXACf4+8CRHGxEZEW3+G0wvmNoEBfuw9XZxulrg81 yxSzorel0TtSD8zbeJJiD9rGU+0HEiUznj5CB1zmluwbWlYjmmonF8n/D9bCyeKo486Y rZhPfoP62Cqb0UPrNRzRYq0eJluoxvP/vKcRFHkc2fYP8S82LKlYRUOXcz7iMlZALlDf id7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJQkJr/OTSfV8X1t4rvn1BM5bRjuVqG92b/FJsqafedjHjxTKN +pyjD9EhoCT3MwMXta6OTTOnS+lv8tFelS9Bllw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxmCf1+dv3fEBVy66Z5YgbaAfWPmIflByk5KRd2rjA0vS0IEy6j9V9AUyowxCOyFslsjeLpA6fm8R6n0MCGB1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:cf:: with SMTP id d15mr11912862qtg.243.1554483783427; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6232_1554379102_5CA5F15E_6232_163_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924C1E3E58@OPEXCAUBMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <77e592a4-1726-eee2-e1d0-1c59700b9215@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <77e592a4-1726-eee2-e1d0-1c59700b9215@joelhalpern.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 13:02:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3w53GZ9xBDYY5J-ZmxsocTPe-19-MTTkap70NG+7Kf-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: stephane.litkowski@orange.com, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8689a0585cb75f8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/1CbPwj66YSVQCWaeoAj81DG0uOo>
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:03:07 -0000

I agree with Joel. I think a reason that we don't yet have implementations
is that this draft has three normative references that are also still
drafts (although
two of them recently joined the RFC Editor's queue and the third has passed
WG LC), so as they get implemented and we get more SFC implementations in
general, I would expect to see activity with this draft as well. It would
be a disservice to wait.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:53 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> I think is a useful complement to the work in RFC 8300.  It appears
> ready for publication.  Given the evolution in SFC usage, I think
> getting this out there now serves the community better than waiting for
> the implementations.  Please do progress this.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
> On 4/4/19 1:58 PM, stephane.litkowski@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi WG,
> >
> > draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane has passed WGLC and its finishing
> > the shepherd’s review phasis (I-D update required).. It is in a good
> > shape to progress further. However we are not aware of any
> > implementation. As per our Implementation Requirement Policy, we need to
> > poll the WG to know if WG agrees to progress the document without
> > implementation.
> >
> > This email starts a 2 weeks poll closing on 04/18/2019.
> >
> > Please raise your support or any concern regarding the progress of this
> > document without implementation.
> >
> > If you are aware of any implementation, please also state it.
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane/
> >
> > Brgds,
> >
> > Stephane & Matthew
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
> ou falsifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > BESS mailing list
> > BESS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>