IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6422112E88C; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:34:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1dsoIXG0Ieo; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533C912D859; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u193so18944406oie.1; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:34:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fDHl+0KfV7l2BwGMG3SYnVWHJCZdN8D5miUyyrA+WCY=; b=sK2+RljTlYMJYM6qXekUpPmzdMaeuGc2aRrqy/yKN0hN7RWLc40vIpRLL4mLYquzvu Gs6Crn4vSVVP4FHVDHPDgI0IYWVhwtnytAhwMB+eNt9REKbC8fcDwGpIS60htuxeU8xn 1iynMvKzU0jSNIGmGMIui1ZZV6HvkztEsRCYUovUnWZBb+7uifhNoaPic/31SF/W796y x5PVOWzEsVhVbjXRsEDf7MN/N0kKE+DtUQm5KaP/i1T4hStiO6xxNwlrmutzAFAECOH2 3gCnV3PCsXkNc0Oo44oHo2Z5BwAIajr920hPFmVc0n720dUbSjwZJXoNV03h7Hy66Uuh WqqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fDHl+0KfV7l2BwGMG3SYnVWHJCZdN8D5miUyyrA+WCY=; b=H5IMZ2uldk2XbItcZjK1iPAOYlX2NPyWSmG0YswjZuxYpGzz/uPKIHvLz0LgZlhd53 UDV3kKWJuzapFHmfM3mUiNJnHr2/lLdiVTso3Ij1IGncO7xtEmSgVeGS8dAZpZP5wjcR 8JvqTU2HNqIk75V7avhf/JR6apv5OgnJES13jsIvDouu7NvTSQ8HYKxT63JjV8i951Rd LbixBkbRiu8IozUOMVGMflGXY2LMJLaW8uvU286DbSJC1vdTcu6OZtmWhQqdzQsiM/yU k+mYzfUjrz62X9GfIRoAV30yrNlZrW0puS+DefVOjbPA0Lxyjz1BfmqwlmyqtZSUmk6Q LWzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mI2nvlAGsWkMb7zO3EwiID/3M6naWPKAQqlZNrFLRimzl9f2fOw LOQhVoYEAjHle+lYRaY89kUkcmOrr3TzqCihPzE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotxLNxAcO2iN3qWli4DK1rmr2g6GuufW2scAzmyhWJ55qKcY87YJOrc0WKRy0hnygSsCxoQkerrpuI2VJdZ0xk=
X-Received: by 10.202.114.88 with SMTP id p85mr9486694oic.214.1513949644610; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 05:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:34:03 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <151386581037.12921.16380046165179697315@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151386581037.12921.16380046165179697315@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:34:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxcDO9EDOtCLOaxeP9ShAsQvs39pqzf=ao+xXsOBo6DpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vijay Gurbani <vkg@acm.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c17420c662550560edde50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/3lTZEaBewQLFlNSGQe6A17YvYM4>
Subject: Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:08 -0000

Vijay:

Hi!

Thanks for your review!

The registry has a FCFS registration policy, so at some point in the life
of draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay the code points were requested — not
necessarily in the draft itself.

Even though draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay is tagged in the datatracker to
have replaced draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay, I think you make a good point in
that the registry needs to be updated with the current/correct information.

Authors:  Please add a note in the IANA Considerations Section to have the
reference in the registry point to this document.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On December 21, 2017 at 9:16:53 AM, Vijay Gurbani (vkg@acm.org) wrote:

Minor issues:
In S13 (IANA Considerations), I am not sure whether this draft is allocating

the tunnel types or not. The responsible IANA registry [0] shows that the
tunnel types mentioned in this draft are already allocated through a
precursor
individual draft [1], which has long expired. However, when I look at the
IANA
Consideration section in [1], it is empty! So I am not sure how the IANA
registry in [0] received the allocations. I think the IANA section of this
draft needs to be updated accordingly.

[0]
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#tunnel-types

[1] http://www.iana.org/go/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay (the expired
individual
draft itself is at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email