Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with COMMENT)
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 20 May 2021 09:26 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D033A0931; Thu, 20 May 2021 02:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.846, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DE7dYOxlbUsE; Thu, 20 May 2021 02:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBAB3A0927; Thu, 20 May 2021 02:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14K9QHdH007880; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:26:17 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5922203A; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:26:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BFD22032; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:26:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (65.151.51.84.dyn.plus.net [84.51.151.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14K9QFw1022827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 May 2021 10:26:16 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Murray Kucherawy' <superuser@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, 'Matthew Bocci' <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
References: <162149468553.26611.1949996838191065913@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <162149468553.26611.1949996838191065913@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 10:26:14 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <057c01d74d5a$2f0f3480$8d2d9d80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQBxBOWtA400eYYrQRzSFPAaNxZrEa24qiMQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.51.151.65
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-26168.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.796-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.796-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-26168.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--2.796000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +c13yJDs903xIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsOC/ExpXrHizzzlv7FEwWOyzSW fNfbIRHaOelJXrqHws0XfYiA4ZuqAOXieiAKy7vIPSCQg3BaqhVBmlBF/IJ0fCMH5JExEm4kVVt Yg9VMBF6DJlHDf5fBO1+24nCsUSFNDScvt6/1O/pTqzaeVVOfNfoLR4+zsDTtjoczmuoPCq3I7L Rnv+vJIXDtNR4je2xwArQyUSjRDWSiRuBDJ4R/4XnDoxqEbiTf5D9smqVBD9yilnnVDECPd/H7A vsTxZMb7DafdH0+BI7qCyYebl7X7A==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/FwEv7Cx18vmcbTwnFHJOxtvMyi8>
Subject: Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 09:26:25 -0000
Thanks Murray, > COMMENT: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Why is the SHOULD in Section 8 only a SHOULD? Why might I legitimately > not do what it says? I need to think about this a bit. My first reaction is that it shouldn't even use 2119 language in that sentence. Probably "can be protected against". Cheers, Adrian
- [bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Adrian Farrel