Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Sat, 10 April 2021 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03AE3A2EC5; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=SmyVt4nJ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cMR2olcp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pftd-pYasIZ2; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FAD3A2EC3; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10384; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1618052287; x=1619261887; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HCXVrwhII6bq4EUlxWGz0/vKq8S3V1q+IunFpfqh2V8=; b=SmyVt4nJj/LYR0522K2OmU0rmeeLCthaivM7GndA68WnsKtGn9uxPQXR jHFr4JGcP6EbhWSRtmPuMyFj87hIKWOonIaYUb5UaX8G6vnOF1A1ubSPM 3pKkTIbLFOE6ptqFiXdt2BdjXTzgvVmb73jvdt5CBkBefravlp/6tHV0/ M=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0ASAADlg3FgmIoNJK1XAxsBAQEBAQEBAQUBAQESAQEBAwMBAQFAgUAEAQEBCwGBUiMugVg2MQqEOINIA4U5iFMDgQmJJY8NgS6BJQNUCwEBAQ0BATICBAEBhFACF4FgAiU2Bw4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBAQFohVANhkQBAQEBAgEjEQwBATcBBAcEAgEIDgMEAQEBAgImAgICHxEVCAgCBAENBQiCaYJWAw4hAQOhDwKKH3eBMoEBggQBAQaFBw0LghMJgQ8qAYJ1g3gRhk4nHIFJQoETQ4FfSjY+gh6BbjgVCiaCUDWCK4FpWwIEAWMEIoEBLxksGSUBkTMSB4JsQpRhkQZbCoMLl0QEhVeDTYp4hhKQGpUVjwCPRIRlAgICAgQFAg4BAQaBWwQtgVtwFYMkUBcCDo4fGR6DOYpZczUDAgYKAQEDCXyLBgGBDgEB
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:3XToHReTsAS1xrCNQUfUAlXplGM/QYqcDmYuwpM6l7JDdLii9J3+P UvZoO9gl0LNQZ6zw/1BguvS9avnXD9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH18AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7e aYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7dp3Sz6XgZHRCsfQZwL/7+T4jVicn/3uuu+prVNgNPgjf1Yb57I Bis6wvLscxDiop5IaF3wRzM8RN1
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:ZYOcXqy8yCHCUWNG24AeKrPxXe8kLtp033Aq2lEZdDV8Sebdv9 yynfgdyB//gCsQXnZlotybJKycWxrnlKJdybI6eZOvRhPvtmftFoFt6oP+3ybtcheRysd07o 0lSaR3DbTLYmRSpczx7BCkV/Mpx9ea+K6l7N2usEtFZysCUdAG0y5SDAGHHkpqACxPApQkHJ SRj/A32QaIU3IRc8i9Gz05RODFvdLGj9bLZhQBCh4h5mC1/HKVwZT9FAWV2QpbbiNXzd4ZgC b4uiHaxoHmifG0zRfAy3Tehq43pPLNwsZObfb88fQ9BS7rjm+TFeFccp2E+As4ueS+rGst+e O83ysIG+RWxzfvcnquoR3rsjOQkAoGz3P501eXjT/CjKXCNUgHIvFMj45YbRfVgnBI1LoXvc 47vBP6i7NtARzNhyj77dTTPisa63acm2YokuIYkhVkIO0jQYJRtoAW8Qd0F5oNDUvBmfgaOd RuF83V6bJqd0qbZRnizxBS6eGrN05DeiuucwwngIi4wjJWlHd2ww8z38oEhEoN85o7Vt1t+/ nEGr4ArsAMcuYmKYZGQMsRS8q+DWLABTjWNniJHFjhHKYbf1rQtp/M5qkv7u3CQu1L8LIC3L D6FH9Iv287fEzjTeeU2odQzxzLSGKhGRPg199Z/Jo8nrHnXrLkPWmiRTkV4o6disRaJveed+ e4OZpQDfOmB3DpA5x10wr3XIQXJmIZVMETp9YnS1ODqs/GMeTRx6vmWceWAICoPScvW2v5DH dGdiP0Pt984keiXWK9gBW5YQKqRmXPubZLVITK9ekaz4YAcqdWtBIOtFi/7saXbTlLsqk8el piMKrq+5nL/FWezCLt1SFEKxBdBkFa7PHLSHVRvzIHNEvybPIEoNWQeWdb2XOdPR9hR8bKEA pSzm4HvZ6fHti1/2QPGtinOmWVgz84v3SRVaoRnaWF+IP4YJ8iF40nX6ZwDA3PEBRwlW9R2T 9+QT5BYnWaOiLliK2jgpBROfrWcMNkhhy3ZeROr2jEiEmarcYzZ3cSUjK0S/SLiQI2Szc8vC wrz4YvxJ673RemMy8WnfkxOlwkUhXnPJt2SCC+ILhytp+uUgdqVmuOjSGdkHgICxrX3nRXoH fgIy2ScezMGXxHtBljo/zX2WIxUHmBdERtbX0/lotxGQ39yypO+N7OQLav2G2MbVZH+MUhCX XuZDsfJR4G/aHr6DechCuCGXI6xp8nI+zaC/A5f6vO3262Qbf45p0uDrta+o1oO8vptfJOWe WDexWNJDe9EO8x3ReJz0xVdRVcuT0hkfny3gfi43X91HkjAeDKKFAOfcBRH/iMq2zlTe2Pyp N3kJY8uvaxKHz4bpqDxbvMZzBObhPVrmjedZBjlblE+aYzvqB0BZ/VTH/B02xGxgw3KIPsj1 wFKZ4LlozpK8tqZYgfaihZ9l0mmJCGK1YqqBX/Bqs7cUs2h3HWMtuV69Pz2PYSK1zEoBG1NU iU8iVb8fuARSeF2LIAA687IGhdaiEHmTxf1fLHc5eVBBShdulF8lb/L2S0d6VFTrOZXboXtR R37riz7qCqXju93BqVuzR1IqhDqTn6BcyzBR+BAu5O/ZixP0+Wjq6j/c60i3P2RFKAGjAlrJ wAcVZVaMJJziQmhskw1CO5T6TsuEIrk1dE+1hc5xfQ85nj5H2eBF1MNA3Sn45fUjZSOGWZlM ity5ns6F3tpDxenYTZHEhefttSC8EdQ4j+ISBpM9URtteTjt0SqzUGZgwvAW46gC382O0j3a 7R4oShZ9Hf
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,210,1613433600"; d="scan'208";a="717992962"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 10 Apr 2021 10:58:06 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13AAw4ZD016960 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:58:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xbe-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:58:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 06:58:02 -0400
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 06:58:02 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fQDs+9LxJT5NUjbtInVrpH7gfExLf8XuMH1o4pzBvqh9K75bVnVR0ha0iceuN8UqLMeW8pOTLg4Wg0err/Kc9WmIt8E3ZHWih/0TaCItlfUrIA+DG4GGRDhFgcW/6ESmJBSP48yqQVjnePAc7kBGzQ7bmsLgvZGhPIvkga95Im3rpmUSAAscr6bEz61ZuqiXoIqRC4StwOHRvNEkmXmwOPwdrDn2uA3ptTcaOnEQTb8GCQ1j1q3f8KFnnixq58J2mmyc4VdS7TKvdqmEAgdbyqt+cW/6RRDSSxZFE0qBhJ1VEFVN8kVHaW3nioM7KE9U/l/6nFyU8C+F0Pv2E406IA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HCXVrwhII6bq4EUlxWGz0/vKq8S3V1q+IunFpfqh2V8=; b=cfIVdiaZY9H2x1r86D+3Uv2GlKzxivajxlKDXPva/ttywmOIFxmKMoCxu/cvkKCVE9RAOoRtmcrTszHRrhtTUw25G/LROPqOkK17GIfyocziRS3zI+aAO+dlqD/CYO9p1Vtkh0DdOS2wwRYncK6q4I669Ce48MsDhxXdkoYFsyzVK0QVbnUu3aJh0oY+S2nO3PHoRn3ih5d5qzk7Rl2dsfTKrtus2w4zv02hdVEnrp+7vK3NSyoGiDHWySegCRB2WaAyOXtrWMFqOg6ia8sESnLHa0GJVtGzR9QRgmpfij0YSrJDSqoOK9RFAVqZevx+yKAOSaFIqw1KIkqmWWFs8w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HCXVrwhII6bq4EUlxWGz0/vKq8S3V1q+IunFpfqh2V8=; b=cMR2olcpszvOO2ifVOrK/vZb2z+wYVSNsDPCph8mr3o0TzW5y8dzVk5ZKKGCArIczVMrC4uLiOb0YLVr4+FYpGNZ5LO585Yob6BcDY4LtMSVRqZ4muW1/qR3e2ZHTLwxl1gsHpmZE924YZWKgd8vgC9GaUMx+bQZp+MVtepXgqI=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by BL0PR11MB3107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:7c::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3999.28; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:58:00 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::24c4:4c09:f6f0:5510]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::24c4:4c09:f6f0:5510%2]) with mapi id 15.20.3999.035; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:58:00 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXLHwrrKYwYtjWR0CAkCddUG254aqrHaOAgAJuXqA=
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:58:00 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43664EA196DAAEF60BA268DBB5729@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <161788896681.26574.4226145616532562392@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEEwqtJ+uFhemPtPjwPTJeEEtiUC+aKgH=AYAzTTu1YCLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEwqtJ+uFhemPtPjwPTJeEEtiUC+aKgH=AYAzTTu1YCLw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.12.233.180]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 35913bf6-c456-4d90-4538-08d8fc0f819d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB3107:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR11MB3107E6FE47CBA0AECE4A330EB5729@BL0PR11MB3107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5516;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(53546011)(86362001)(52536014)(6506007)(5660300002)(7696005)(76116006)(26005)(186003)(33656002)(9686003)(66556008)(66476007)(54906003)(71200400001)(64756008)(55016002)(110136005)(19627235002)(316002)(66446008)(83380400001)(2906002)(8676002)(4326008)(478600001)(8936002)(66946007)(38100700002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 35913bf6-c456-4d90-4538-08d8fc0f819d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Apr 2021 10:58:00.1722 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 28rSrtIhlamNpZztSd/bC5lrbdcB89jpAPML5oj+5ZaoiNcSvylNrYSgK055AIKYov5pudFdjTSkQOjGiijAZw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR11MB3107
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.19, xbe-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/I3ddYOCpUut6-wf0LHOjWdHfnlU>
Subject: Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:58:14 -0000
Hi Donald, Copying Martin for the 802.1Q normative reference question. Please see inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> > Sent: 08 April 2021 22:08 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> > Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk@ietf.org; > bess-chairs@ietf.org; BESS <bess@ietf.org>; Matthew Bocci > <matthew.bocci@nokia.com> > Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req- > frmwk-08: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Rob, > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:36 AM Robert Wilton via Datatracker > <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection > > > >... > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for this document. > > > > It's a bit unclear to me whether the descriptions/definitions of > MIP/MEP/MA/MD > > are coming from CFM or RFC 6136. Section 1.1 suggests that they are > coming > > from CFM (but without a normative reference to 802.1Q), but the > terminology > > implies that they are being taken from RFC 6136. > > Although I have tweaked them a bit, the descriptions/definitions were > in the draft when I took up the pen along with the reference to RFC > 6136. So I don't know where they came from. Surely the important thing > is their accuracy. [RW] I guess I feel that subsequent parts of the document assume a more detailed understanding of what MIPS/MEPS are than is described in the terminology. This is fine, and I don't think that further text in the terminology is required, but it was unclear to me, that if a reader wanted to better understand what is meant by these terms whether they should be looking at RFC 6136 or 802.1Q, and I was hoping that the document could clarify/choose a definitive source reference. My impression, given how they are used, is that a reference to 802.1Q for CFM is probably most useful. > > > Certainly, there seem to be places in this document where more meaning > of > > these terms seems to be expected than what is provided in the > terminology > > section. Section 2.6 refers to CCMs, but I think that a reader would > only > > understand what these are if they have read CFM. Hence, I think that > this > > document would probably benefit from having a normative reference to > 802.1Q > > rather than informative. > > I have no problem with adding more references to 802.1Q but would > moving 802.1Q from Informational to Normative require a new Last Call > since it is not an IETF Standards Track document? [RW] Yes, I think that would be required. But I've not raised this as a discuss level concern so will defer to the responsible AD here. > > > Minor comments: > > > > 2.1 OAM Layering > > > > "and shows which devices have visibility into what OAM layer(s)." > > > > Perhaps indicate by the 'o' symbol. Otherwise the fact that the Link OAM > is the > > end point of the physical links, whereas the other OAM endpoints are may > cause > > confusion. > > I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. The ends of the Link OAM > correspond to the ports. The other types of OAM generally run between > the central control planes of the nodes. [RW] > Do you want me to add > something to the text about the 'o' symbols? ("and, as indicated by > where the "o"s line up, shows which devices have visibility into what > OAM layer(s).") Or what? [RW] Yes, this is what I was suggesting, but it is at the authors' discretion. > > > Figure 2: > > While I tried to give some hints in the details of this Figure, in > some of your comments below I think you are trying to read way too > much into fine details of this very high level diagram. [RW] Perhaps. I'm happy to leave it to the authors' discretion as to whether to change this but have given further comments below. > > > - Would it be helpful to move the 'o' marks to the end of the PE > devices, to > > line up with the Link OAM end points? > > > > - Is "Service CFM" the right term here? Does this mean "Service OAM - > CFM"? > > Probably should be "CFM (Service OAM)" and the PE "o" marks for it > should be moved to line up with the CE facing edge of the PE since > those ports are what are involved. Network OAM, such as BFD, logically > runs between central control planes of the PEs so having the "o" > centrally under the PE seems best to me. [RW] The reason that I suggested moving these (for figure 2 only, not figure 1) is because I interpret figure 2 as specifically talking about Ethernet EVPNs, using CFM and Link OAM. Figure 3 and the associated text also gives a description of the appropriate demarcation point for CE facing MIPS and MEPS and describes is as being much more closely aligned to ports (i.e., towards the PE forwarding mechanism) then a single central control plane location. Hence, I think that if I was drawing this diagram, with symbols to indicate the demarcation points, then I would probably have drawn it slightly differently, with the o symbols in slightly different places. Probably along with a short explanation on why it is different to figure 1, tying it to section 2.2. But as above, I'm happy to leave it to the authors to decide whether what I propose would make the document clearer. > > > - Probably helpful to add an informative reference to 802.3 Link OAM, > which is > > in figure 2. > > OK, that can be made into a reference. > > > 2.2 EVPN Service OAM > > > > - I'm not sure how clear "towards the device" is when the point is > already > > within the device. > > How about "towards the core of the device"? A port is one the edge of > a device so I think that saying it is "within the device" has a > slightly wrong connotation. [RW] I agree that "towards the core of the devices" is clearer. > > If you have two devices with 4 ports as follows: > P1-Dev1-P2----------P3-Dev2-P4 > CFM permits you to run tests between P1 and P2 or between P3 and P4 > that test the continuity through and switching fabric of the devices > without using a link. Of course, you can also run tests from P1 to P3 > or P2 to P3 or P1 to P4 or whatever. (Not all implementations of CFM > actually do all this. Some implement the MEPs/MIPs as virtual MEPs/MPs > in the ports that are actually implemented in the central control > plane of the device.) [RW] Yes. Hence why I was suggesting that moving the 'o' symbols on figure 2 may be clearer. > > > - The up and down arrows for the MEPS ("^" and "V") seem to potentially > make > > Figure 3 more confusing. Also "down" should be changed to "Down" in the > last > > CE. > > OK on the case change. So, on the ASCII art arrow heads, you think I > should just delete them? [RW] That would be my recommendation, but happy to leave it to the authors' discretion. > > > Nits: > > > > I'm not sure why the PE nodes are numbered by CE nodes are not. > > Since these numbers are never used in the text, I'm inclined to eliminate > them. [RW] Thanks, Rob > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > d3e3e3@gmail.com > > > Regards, > > Rob
- [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Rob Wilton (rwilton)