Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 26 November 2018 02:47 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A71128C65; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_v9DjhRXM4Y; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDE412785F; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so15087836lji.11; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PTI++rqpWVRLqPQ85nkUD8i88lYlJklAlBWjYkUlhDY=; b=QiYwHJrrPJDYI3tl2/EKp/EvhrdNiGx5t5UUw3fBZZ2GtumARaqdJGRf5uPvxZ0JA2 icU79djx0NHBS0CgjBstmLFt+19D/eX4GoszDOLyOX5afDSRvdf+AxSbuk8rfyrWP4g+ nTRJH8n787sRlsmjYIY70Vc655Uco5u53wVbg5eH3pR2WOloDkjdTV2HfiMslNPOU/vn mgiHXbnKrY9DdA3XHrEuV/AUsK6ZuZATLGts+7GJVIftTaMQuDjMNZ8ofPpjYg+o61nH MSUzF+Zy0+xu5NtpWgUeroaIsix7Rp3C8k4dtliv4GQFmPVISXzwUklIfj9zpwikCFfo lDhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PTI++rqpWVRLqPQ85nkUD8i88lYlJklAlBWjYkUlhDY=; b=Ffr5N3AU9drqJmhypMbT9mwvL731WBAsOLjrHwpycTHUHFv9WkMvMQ4/DzeTs15peI luMMk+aR519iMb1VPiXJQ1cxQMBF079Rp1LozmwtdKUXpoqkOTeX4jREBuyKM0ptmOGp yUNRGoiyTtssw2J/e/pjsyNOHvlcF5K1ibUJu0tS4mOwXikDJsizedrxPldEq/dqiwDL kXp2rynWAOZgOKhs5kVEJXEeW+HJrtQ/t7iuIXFxtycqyTMQzKeeZGZTj09WBIc3k0Ob 4iGqQc8a+N59a8D64tE98PLZPi/ItK10L6UYt++ZdUTLs8KQNwgJ+IqdlRAjfCnnx64h CrBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJihKswvkkvej6yDJ+BoFq58KCKJ8mb7G5jd+Trkjj8OtL9HjU4 hQqQgJ003JPqz05Au8lws8M/69uxotz7YXieuSw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/U0sLkR+ErbKDkxq+YTfrsLKS7wbW3LxZhrtGjHpHxoV8P3YdxC2xBfZ051fQkCQdtu6djKWD65Rr+3gfPAAeE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c52:: with SMTP id t18-v6mr13068493ljj.149.1543200456435; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <26502_1542873261_5BF660AD_26502_47_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B7752E9@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <26502_1542873261_5BF660AD_26502_47_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B7752E9@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:47:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmX1htDe7sY2HWu-HDC7c6ZmuLF2py5nURSpkKC8HPHC1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
Cc: BESS <bess@ietf.org>, bess-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005ef64057b885b55"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/SwN2MR1Ph6CCfQcTOKH4fLYxXUo>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:47:41 -0000
Hi Stephane, et al., I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft other than already disclosed. RE: implementation status In Q1 of 2019, ZTE will release a product that includes support of this draft. Regards, Greg On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:54 PM <stephane.litkowski@orange.com> wrote: > Hello Working Group, > > > > This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-04 [1] > > > > This poll runs until *the 6th of December*. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > > > Currently two IPRs have been disclosed against this Document. > > > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. > > > > Thank you, > > Stephane & Matthew > > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/ > > > > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
- [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draf… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Thomas Morin
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Robert Kebler
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC,IPR and implementation poll for d… zhang.zheng
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC,IPR and implementation poll for d… zhang.zheng
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC,IPR and implementation poll for d… zhang.zheng
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang