[bess] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10: (with DISCUSS)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope that I'm just misunderstanding something obvious, but I strongly support
John's DISCUSS -- when SR was "approved" it was with the understanding that it
would only be used within "real" limited domains, and would never be sent
outside of closed/limited network.

The document says: "The solution defined in this document can be seen in the
broader context of SR domain interconnection in
[I-D.farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect]. ", which says: " Traffic
originating in one SR domain often terminates in another SR domain, but must
transit a backbone network that provides interconnection between those
domains." -- is it unclear to me if this is really what is being proposed...

I'm hoping that I'm really misunderstanding something here -- please educate me.