[bess] Re: FW: Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

[[e-mail]]

Hi folks,

 

Just a reminder that this document is blocked for progressing, because we still haven’t got IPR replies from all co-authors (at least active ones).

 

 

From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <slitkows=[e-mail]> 
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 3:46 PM
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [bess] FW: Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

 

Hi Authors,

 

Could you please reply to this new IPR poll regarding draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking ?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Stephane

 

 

From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > 
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 7:59 PM
To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <jorge.rabadan=[e-mail] <mailto:jorge.rabadan=[e-mail]> >; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> ; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> ; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

 

Thanks Jorge.

 

Yeah, as the IPR call was done a long time ago, I want to ensure we capture any new IPR disclosure before we send to IESG.

 

 

From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) < <mailto:jorge.rabadan=[e-mail]> jorge.rabadan=[e-mail]> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:00 PM
To:  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]; Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) < <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]>;  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail];  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

 

Hi Stephane,

 

Version 13 posted, addressing all the comments in the WG last call.

 

Also I’m not aware of any related IPR.

(sorry, it was not clear to me if we, authors, had to reply again with this).

 

Thanks!

Jorge

 

From:  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail] < <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM
To: 'Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)' < <mailto:slitkows=[e-mail]> slitkows=[e-mail]>,  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail] < <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]>,  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail] < <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12


 

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.

 

Hi WG,

 

WGLC is now closed.

 

We received few comments during this WGLC. Authors, please address them in a new version.

 

I’m also waiting for the IPR disclosure replies and then we can move forward with the draft.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) < <mailto:slitkows=[e-mail]> slitkows=[e-mail]> 
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 11:25 AM
To:  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail];  <mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]
Subject: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12

 

Hi,

 

As draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking went through multiple discussions that seem to be closed now. We would like to do a new short WGLC of 1-week to gather any additional comment before we move forward with the draft.

 

The WGLC poll starts today and will end on 2/3.

 

Similarly, as the last IPR poll was done a long time back. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

 

Thank you

 

Brgds,

 

 

Stephane, Matthew, Jeffrey (BESS chairs)